Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC003406805
4 novembre 2014
4 novembre 2014
These observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0607DEC004489310
7 juin 2016
7 juin 2016
15 July 2010 and 21 November 2014 respectively, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant in the first case, Mr Sergey Vasilyevich Zhernosek, is a national of Belarus
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219280
23 août 2022
23 août 2022
The application to this Court was lodged by the Official Solicitor on the applicant’s behalf. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC006823713
21 janvier 2021
21 janvier 2021
Osnach, who was invited to submit the observations on behalf of the applicant. This letter returned to the Registry as wrongly addressed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC003504206
11 octobre 2011
11 octobre 2011
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC000992918
24 novembre 2022
24 novembre 2022
At the same time, he stated that he would “most probably” send the just satisfaction claims on behalf of the applicant by fax. However, no just satisfaction claims have been received by the Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC001667215
21 janvier 2021
21 janvier 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148602
13 novembre 2014
13 novembre 2014
On 17 October 2007 criminal proceedings were brought against the applicants by the Malatya Public Prosecutor for making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation, the “DHKP/C” (Revolutionary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0826DEC005223509
26 août 2014
26 août 2014
He died on 21 January 2013 and the applicant’s son, Mr Igor Nakovski, expressed his intention to pursue the application on behalf of his late father.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125DEC007937617
25 novembre 2021
25 novembre 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248725
19 janvier 2026
19 janvier 2026
Do the applicants have standing to complain about Mr Tatunashvili’s detention (see, for the general principles, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225803
12 juin 2023
12 juin 2023
(iii) Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention (see
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2513
6 septembre 2007
6 septembre 2007
When the hospital failed to respond positively to their complaint, the applicants applied to the court of first instance and, acting on behalf of their child, claimed non‑pecuniary damage for an alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC003683414
8 avril 2021
8 avril 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representatives, who were invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicants. No observations were submitted.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207909
15 janvier 2021
15 janvier 2021
Did the applicant A.P. have standing to act on behalf of the minor applicant A.M. (see Eberhard and M. v. Slovenia , nos. 8673/05 and 9733/05, 1 December 2009, § 90)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224906
24 avril 2023
24 avril 2023
Ukraine lodged on 26 May 2014 communicated on 24 April 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the judicial proceedings initiated by the Deputy Prosecutor of the Chernivtsi Region on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11337
6 décembre 2016
6 décembre 2016
In the instant case, the relatives pursuing the applications on behalf of the fourteen deceased applicants allege that the applicants were among some 170 people to have been killed by the security
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002135405
2 novembre 2010
2 novembre 2010
Mora Bajrami, on behalf of the “ Helsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia”. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622DEC005803712
22 juin 2023
22 juin 2023
Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the Government’s observations were forwarded to the applicants’ lawyer, and he was invited to submit by 3 November 2021 the written observations on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177245
29 août 2017
29 août 2017
Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 86 sur 556