CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711DEC001339413

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2017

11 juillet 2017

In August 2011 it issued a response stating that the applicant did not have a right to long-term conjugal visits because he was serving his sentence in prison.

Page 85 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC004626306

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

In relation to the applicant’s complaints, the Government submitted that they were inadmissible, either because he had failed to exhaust domestic remedies or because his complaints were manifestly ill-founded

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD002126304

Admin. suprême

19 février 2009

19 février 2009

Three hearings were adjourned because the judge was involved in other proceedings and another because the judge was ill. Two hearings were adjourned because of the absence of both parties. THE LAW I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD002989803

Admin. suprême

15 février 2007

15 février 2007

    On 28 August 2002 the Yakutsk Town Court dismissed the action because the municipal authorities had not been responsible for the damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0125DEC003260296

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2000

25 janvier 2000

They confiscated the administration of the applicant company because there was a suspicion that the applicant company had been drawing up false invoices. The applicant company ceased trading.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD006170812

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2014

24 avril 2014

Further, some minor delays can be attributed to the applicant because of the requests he made for hearings to be postponed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175532

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2017

20 juin 2017

He also stated that he had stayed in the car because he had refused to participate in the robbery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC005981612

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

    The Government argued that the applicants had not exhausted the domestic remedies because they had not raised any such complaint in their constitutional complaint. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC002952107

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2010

14 septembre 2010

His request was rejected because the reasoning was classified as   confidential.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326JUD004501305

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2019

26 mars 2019

    The ill effects of the premature death of the applicant’s brother still obtain because he is no longer alive. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD001037402

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

The examinations were not ordered because the applicant withdrew his requests. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC000012505

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

Since at the time of Marija Rašeta’s death on 7 February 1999, she was not the owner of the flat in question because a contract of sale had not been concluded beforehand and the judgment replacing such

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145894

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2014

30 juin 2014

However, because of prolonged conflict between their parents, and, in part because of the father’s influence, the daughters had established parental alienation syndrome with regard to their mother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC007814501

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2006

23 mars 2006

The fourth co-accused also withdrew his testimonies against the applicant and said that he had given false evidence because he did not like him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409JUD000096318

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

    On 21 November 2007 the applicant was summarily dismissed ( izvanredni otkaz ) because of his statements to the newspapers and for disclosing to them the above information (see paragraphs

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD003123714

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2023

24 janvier 2023

    Furthermore, the enforcement was allegedly incompatible with Romanian law because under the said law: (i) only assets of persons who were accused, defendants or civilly liable in criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111611

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2012

24 mai 2012

Because of the severe burns he had serious breathing difficulties and underwent multiple skin grafts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0428JUD002347215

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2022

28 avril 2022

It also held that there had been no breach of the applicant’s right to an oral hearing because of Croatia’s reservation to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention which excluded the right to a public hearing in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC000148511

Admin. suprême

25 août 2015

25 août 2015

The Court refused the argument relied on by the bank, that the civil avenue had been excluded in the present case because of the clause contained in the framework contract according to which all disputes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0712JUD001855706

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2007

12 juillet 2007

The judgment remained unenforced because the Council had no available housing or financial resources to purchase a flat. 8.

Source officielle