This was excessive, in view of the applicant’s particular circumstances and what was at stake for him in the verification procedure.

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what

Constitutional Court has to be considered as the final decision regarding the subject of this particular complaint as the applicants alleged at the time a violation of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention while

is to pay the applicant, within three months, the amount indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b

  The criminal proceedings against the applicant   On 2 September 1992, while the proceedings concerning the accusation of a theft were still pending, the applicant was accused of a murder.

is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

However, for the purposes of the examination of the present case, it is not necessary to determine whether the respondent State may be held responsible for the length of consideration of the applicant’

    The Court reiterates that a person who has obtained a judgment against the State may not be expected to bring separate enforcement proceedings (see Metaxas v.

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what

By recourse to this principle courts ensure that executive agents of the state do not misuse the coercive, law enforcement functions of the courts and thereby oppress citizens of the state.

  The Council of State concluded that the prospects for him to start an orderly life were not worse in Italy than in Switzerland.

The Court recalls that the time to be taken into consideration starts running with the institution of the proceedings (see Scopelliti v.

  (b)     What types of weapons were used by the Azerbaijani armed forces during the clashes in April 2016?

Allegedly, the investigator also told the applicant to include in his statement a disclaimer confirming that he had no complaints about the prison staff.

Marioli, President at the State Legal Council, and their Agent’s delegates, Ms Z.   Hatzipavlou and Ms A.

    On 16 June 2022 the Chișinău District Court approved the final liquidation report of the state-company C.M. and ordered its removal from the State Register of Legal Entities.

Marioli, President of the State Legal Council, and their Agent’s delegate, Ms S.

    On 31 August 2020 the applicant brought a tort action under the State and Municipalities Responsibility for Damage Act 1988 (hereinafter “the 1988 Act”), seeking compensation for the delay

The first applicant changed his statement during the main hearing claiming, in substance, that what he had said during the pre-trial procedure had been extorted by torture.