Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC001748202
7 mars 2006
7 mars 2006
Presence at the hearing Pursuant to Article 451: The appellate court shall order an accused, who is detained, to be brought to the appellate hearing, unless it finds that the presence of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0509DEC005332999
9 mai 2006
9 mai 2006
The fourth hearing was postponed by three months and sixteen days at the request of the applicant’s lawyer in order to have all witnesses questioned at the same hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227938
7 septembre 2023
7 septembre 2023
#xa0; Severodvinsk Town Court of the Arkhangelsk Region 24/11/2020 28/05/2020 24/11/2020 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2049734-2168441
29 juin 2007
29 juin 2007
It relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 10 (freedom of expression). Lewandowski v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617DEC007629901
17 juin 2003
17 juin 2003
On 28 March 1994 the Warsaw Regional Court held the first hearing in this case.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC007300301
30 avril 2002
30 avril 2002
The court held a further hearing on 25 October 1993.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0831DEC004640799
31 août 2000
31 août 2000
A hearing was fixed for 6 October 1993 but was cancelled because of the elections. On 10 October 1993 the applicant asked the court to fix a new hearing date.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146461
28 août 2014
28 août 2014
The applicant did not receive any summons with regard to the hearing of 25 December 2009.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC003302603
29 septembre 2009
29 septembre 2009
The first hearing scheduled for 24 September 1996 was postponed for administrative reasons.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2211165-2364869
14 décembre 2007
14 décembre 2007
He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207DEC002899910
7 décembre 2017
7 décembre 2017
He, however, did not attend an appeal hearing of which he had been informed by the court’s Registry.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0126DEC004029398
26 janvier 1999
26 janvier 1999
The date of the hearing was scheduled for 12 April 1994.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD001566703
16 janvier 2007
16 janvier 2007
The first hearing was held on 15 July 2003. 54 hearings were held in the case up until 16 February 2005 and about 70 hearings in total before the first-instance court up until
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0225JUD003184905
25 février 2010
25 février 2010
The hearing of 15 November did not take place because the witnesses did not attend the hearing. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175016
7 juin 2017
7 juin 2017
However, the appeal court proceeded with the hearing listed for the same afternoon, noting in its judgment of 12 August 2009 that “the defendant had been notified of the hearing date and had not lodged
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10238
29 octobre 1991
29 octobre 1991
Sweden - 11274/84 Judgment 29.10.1991 Article 6 Article 6-1 Public hearing First-instance conviction upheld by Court of Appeal without a public hearing: no violation [This summary is extracted from the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201490
30 janvier 2020
30 janvier 2020
COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention about his absence from the appeal hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10240
29 octobre 1991
29 octobre 1991
Sweden - 12631/87 Judgment 29.10.1991 Article 6 Article 6-1 Public hearing First-instance conviction upheld by Court of Appeal without a public hearing: no violation [This summary is extracted from the
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68105-68573
14 novembre 2000
14 novembre 2000
In addition, P. invokes Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 17 (prohibition of abuse of rights), in that the relevant national legislation destroys his right to a public hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168635
20 octobre 2016
20 octobre 2016
He specified that he wished to attend the appellate hearing. 5.
Source officiellePage 84 sur 1853