As to the applicant’s challenge concerning Judge A.T., the court decided, with the parties’ agreement, that it should be examined after her challenge against Judge G.D.M. had been decided. 30.

For the same reasons the parties to the proceedings may challenge [a judge]. A challenge must be declared, and reasons given, before the examination of the merits of the case.

W-B7K-E6AS ORDONNANCE DE RÉFÉRÉ DU 26 MAI 2026 ---------------- A l'audience publique des référés tenue le vingt six Mai deux mil vingt six, Nous, Sébastien MORGAN, président du tribunal judiciaire de CHALONS

He also sought to challenge the sentence by way of direct appeals to the President of the State and the Human Rights Commissioner.

Convention, he alleges that, following his detention on remand, he was returned to the security directorate for interrogation pursuant to the Law-Decree no. 430, that he did not have an effective remedy to challenge

He challenged the travel ban to the Moscow region. He alleges that no decision has been taken pursuant to this complaint.

The first and second applicants challenged the removal decision before the Debrecen High Court.

In September 1995 the Court of Cassation of the Canton of Ticino also declared an appeal by the applicant on points of law inadmissible on the ground that a conviction in absentia must be challenged by

On the same day they challenged the decision of the bank’s bailiff to sell their apartment at auction while they intended to pay the amount for which they were liable.

Relying on Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with Articles 3 and 5 the applicant complains that he had no effective remedy by which he could have challenged the lawfulness of his detention and

The applicant challenged the decision to discontinue the case and what had gone on in those administrative proceedings by means of an appeal under Article 19 and 20 of Law no. 68/2021 which gave rise to

Law – Article 6 § 1 (a)     Admissibility – Exhaustion of domestic remedies : In his appeal on points of law the applicant had challenged the Court of Appeal’s findings as to the exact extent

X... n'avait pas pu, du fait de l'accident, accéder aux grades supérieurs de commander puis de captain ; qu'en indemnisant cependant uniquement le préjudice résultant de la perte d'une chande d'être commander

La SASU Challenger Auto, dont M.

  However, on 9 December 1974, the court upheld the challenge of 13 November.

surconsommation de chaleur, du fait d'une surchauffe qu'elles imputent à faute à la société Cogestar.

    As to the objective test, the Court notes that the applicants had lodged a challenge for bias before the court of appeal, arguing that Judge I.C.B. had lacked impartiality because he had

During the proceedings, he challenged the accuracy of the second post-mortem report and Dr M. was cross-examined. The defence were able to present their own expert.

the child reaches the age of majority” Finally, under Article   86 of the Code, as amended with effect from 13   June 2009, paternity may at any time (as long as the child is alive) be challenged