Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0719DEC000453470
19 juillet 1971
19 juillet 1971
This provision states that if "the main trial cannot be held for a long time because of the absence of the person charged or because of some other impediment on his part, the court may by order provisionally
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0325DEC006105908
25 mars 2010
25 mars 2010
Accordingly, on 8 May 2008 the Klanjec Municipal Court terminated the proceedings because the State Attorney’s Office had dropped the charges.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120DEC003913506
20 novembre 2012
20 novembre 2012
On 25 March 2005 the Plovdiv District Court quashed the decision of 10 March 2004, finding it null and void because it did not specify the plots it concerned and did not contain sufficient
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000402603
4 décembre 2008
4 décembre 2008
However, on that date the case was adjourned until 1 November 2000 because the judge was involved in unrelated proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC000755703
11 septembre 2007
11 septembre 2007
Furthermore, the court recalled that an affirmation in lieu of an oath was not sufficient in such proceedings, because it could only be qualified as a simple declaration.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC004278098
23 octobre 2001
23 octobre 2001
According to that note, she had married the first applicant on 18 June 1997 and did not wish that any member of her husband’s family should go to prison because of the incident.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0408DEC003158202
8 avril 2003
8 avril 2003
he has not given evidence, because failure to give evidence cannot on its own prove guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1209DEC001488803
9 décembre 2004
9 décembre 2004
I assure you that the police knows every single [sale-purchase] point and every single dealer – in this sense they work very well [because] it brings them profit...
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0505DEC001136985
5 mai 1986
5 mai 1986
He pointed out that he agreed to the settlement solely because of his old age (67), his poor health (90% invalidity), because the proceedings had already lasted for ten years and would have lasted
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD000682212
7 septembre 2017
7 septembre 2017
The applicant did not appear because she was in hospital. Her representative informed the court that she would be fit for questioning as of March 2006.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163145
27 avril 2016
27 avril 2016
He says that he did not do so because he was illiterate, unaware of the legal options available to him, indigent, and not in a position to seek legal aid. 13 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619DEC001797809
19 juin 2012
19 juin 2012
Between June 2010 and January 2011 seven hearings were scheduled, only one of which was postponed because the parties failed to appear.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1118DEC001748708
18 novembre 2010
18 novembre 2010
The next on-site visit, scheduled for 27 March 2007, was adjourned because the defendants did not attend.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD002858504
15 juillet 2010
15 juillet 2010
Three of them were adjourned because the judge was involved in other proceedings and one on account of his illness.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC001311908
19 mars 2013
19 mars 2013
The applicant’s brother did not find the applicant because he had been looking in the wrong place.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0903DEC000345306
3 septembre 2013
3 septembre 2013
The applicant also argued that he had not failed to meet his obligation under section 11(2) of the Currency Act, because he had intended to declare the money. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128DEC005495007
28 janvier 2014
28 janvier 2014
On 8 March 2004 the Timişoara Radiocommunications Agency notified the applicant that his lease would be terminated and asked him to vacate the apartment he was leasing because – amongst other
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0526DEC003333102
26 mai 2005
26 mai 2005
The court considered that the applicant had committed this offence because he behaved and appeared as the Mufti of Xanthi.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002909995
17 janvier 1996
17 janvier 1996
On 10 December 1994, having seen the relevant newspaper report and since the applicant felt that he had been defamed because of his involvement in the programme referred to in the T.D.'
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215DEC003407003
15 février 2007
15 février 2007
The applicant filed an appeal, arguing that the District Court’s judgment was arbitrary, because the expert opinion used by the court did not provide a definite conclusion and because the results of the
Source officiellePage 84 sur 1499