CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

45 102 résultats pour « Alfred »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526DEC002312606

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

    Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant alleged that he had been subjected to torture during his detention in police custody.

Source officielle

Page 84 sur 2256

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226045

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2023

27 juin 2023

    Can the applicant claim to be a victim of the alleged violation of Article 6 on account of the alleged partiality of the judges of the High Court of Justice of Catalonia, having regard to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209DEC002680808

Admin. suprême

9 février 2010

9 février 2010

In his statements before the judge, the applicant retracted his statements to the police and alleged that he had been blindfolded and forced to sign those statements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC002516308

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2016

13 septembre 2016

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION 41.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD004400120

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2021

2 décembre 2021

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113587

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2012

12 septembre 2012

(invokes Articles   13 and 14 of the Convention); (e)     alleged coercion to perform forced labour in detention without remuneration (invokes Article 4 of the Convention); (f)   &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142203

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

He alleged that the meat was not well boiled and very often he received raw bacon uncut.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177289

Admin. suprême

30 août 2017

30 août 2017

The application concerns the alleged failure of the national authorities to discharge their obligations to protect the applicant’s life, home and well ‑ being due to the setting up, next to his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9227

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2013

21 novembre 2013

Belgium - 23380/09 Judgment 21.11.2013 [Section V] Article 3 Degrading treatment Alleged administration of a slap by a police officer to an individual during police interview: no violation   [This

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142497

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2014

18 mars 2014

The applicant alleged that he was held in severe overcrowding, sharing a 15 sq. m room with other eight   detainees in what he described as inhuman conditions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6456

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2012

18 septembre 2012

Austria (no. 2) - 3084/07 Judgment 18.9.2012 [Section I] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Publication of untrue statements concerning alleged judicial bias: no violation   Facts – In

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244708

Admin. suprême

8 août 2025

8 août 2025

In 2022 criminal proceedings were instituted concerning the alleged ill ‑ treatment following the applicant’s criminal complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179961

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2017

14 décembre 2017

The complaint was dismissed on the ground that there was no evidence supporting the alleged discriminatory treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242679

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2025

13 mars 2025

March 2025   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 2987/24 Marina ALANAKIAN against Georgia lodged on 17 January 2024 communicated on 13 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243170

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2025

17 avril 2025

In particular, have they provided an adequate legal framework for the applicant’s protection against the alleged acts of domestic violence?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216012

Admin. suprême

1 février 2022

1 février 2022

The applicant also complains under Article 11 that the alleged ill-treatment led to a violation of his right of peaceful assembly.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245395

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2025

18 septembre 2025

FOURTH SECTION Application no. 32326/24 Lia TABATADZE against Georgia lodged on 1 November 2024 communicated on 18 September 2025 STATEMENT OF FACTS The application concerns the respondent State’s alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200739

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2020

6 janvier 2020

dissemination of defamatory information, as well as the domestic courts’ refusal to admit the applicants’ civil claim lodged against the law-enforcement authorities concerning the alleged unlawfulness

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1112DEC004903109

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2019

12 novembre 2019

Invoking Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant also alleged that he had been subjected to ill ‑ treatment during his questioning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC000752815

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2015

8 décembre 2015

However, the only remedies which Article 35 § 1 requires being exhausted are those that relate to the breach alleged and are available and sufficient.

Source officielle