CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD003959506
25 juillet 2017
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)
Page 83 sur 763
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD003494205
12 juillet 2016
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD005632413
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD004825511
19 octobre 2017
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD002733513
13 novembre 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD001399105
4 décembre 2014
In such cases, the Court must establish whether the other grounds cited by the judicial authorities continued to justify the deprivation of liberty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD002664912
23 février 2016
passage of time, the initial grounds for pre-trial detention become less and less relevant and the domestic courts should rely on other “relevant” and “sufficient” grounds to justify the deprivation of liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD003987318
15 avril 2021
In the intervener’s view, the deprivation of liberty of elderly people required conditions of detention facilities to be adjusted to their needs and an adequate level of medical care to be provided.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD001202516
22 avril 2021
judicial review of the lawfulness of his pre-trial detention by the Constitutional Court, as provided for by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000933320
20 mai 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD001367915
18 mars 2021
lodged a constitutional complaint against the decision of the Varaždin County Court of 28 July 2014 (see paragraph 7 above), arguing, inter alia , that it lacked relevant reasoning and that his right to liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD004171608
29 mai 2012
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0126JUD002910909
26 janvier 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0126JUD002911609
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD006022511
15 avril 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD001797010
29 mars 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD001093218
9 juin 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD005071119
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD005658915
23 juin 2022
applicants had failed to exhaust the available domestic remedies, arguing that they could have lodged an application with the domestic courts seeking an acknowledgement of a violation of their right to liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD004457019
13 juin 2024
When ordering a security measure involving deprivation of liberty, the court shall immediately inform the person concerned of the maximum number of months for which he or she may be deprived of his or