CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

37 047 résultats pour « Hechinger »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0307DEC002077292

Admin. suprême

7 mars 1996

7 mars 1996

His request for an oral hearing was not mentioned in the decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC003000609

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

The hearing was adjourned to give the lawyer time to study the case file. 16 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122668

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2013

20 juin 2013

The initial hearing took place on 17 June 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930DEC006958401

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2004

30 septembre 2004

On 30 September 1986, during a first oral hearing, the parties declared that they were willing to reach an understanding and only thereafter hold another hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115429

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2012

20 novembre 2012

the new hearing in the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC006341300

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2004

29 janvier 2004

On 29 October 1992 the mayor held another hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115439

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2012

23 novembre 2012

The parties were absent from the hearing, the court noting that each of them had been summoned. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13357

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2021

22 juin 2021

Further, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division had held that in the circumstances of this particular case, limitations of the applicant’s right under domestic law to be present at the hearing had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243285

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2025

23 avril 2025

During the final hearing the applicant was removed from the hearing room, and the examination of the case continued without the applicant or his representatives present, ultimately concluding in their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229631

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2023

21 novembre 2023

According to the law at the time the deposit for the security for costs was to be paid “not later than two days before the date set for the hearing”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6344

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2001

31 octobre 2001

On 28   November 1997 the applicant's lawyer was summoned to attend a hearing to be held in the United States one week later.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109460

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2012

15 mars 2012

The previous hearing had ended at 8:02 pm the day before and she had to prepare for the next hearing late at night. During the hearing, the judge heard the current Prime Minister, Mykola Azarov.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211JUD004635411

Admin. suprême

11 février 2020

11 février 2020

The applicant was absent from the appeal hearing. The appeal decision reads as follows: “The defendant has not attended the appeal hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0213JUD000332419

Admin. suprême

13 février 2024

13 février 2024

The trial court granted her request and adjourned the hearing. 35.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214413

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

Turkey 20/04/2020 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 191 18068/20 Yüksel v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0325JUD007759701

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2003

25 mars 2003

Nevertheless, the court granted the application and adjourned the hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD002571703

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

13 novembre 2007

fair hearing. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD002456404

Admin. suprême

3 février 2011

3 février 2011

    At the hearings of 27 February and 15 April 2003 the applicant amended his claims. Both hearings were adjourned to enable the respondent to study the amendments. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC002051008

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

Since then the applicant did not attend the hearings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD000083703

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

    On 20 November 2001 the Tverskoy District Court held a hearing. Both the applicant and his representative were present. The hearing was adjourned until 13 December 2001. 10.

Source officielle

Page 83 sur 1853

← PrécédentSuivant →