CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

59 099 résultats pour « Febbraro »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242272

Admin. suprême

13 février 2025

13 février 2025

On 18 February 2021 the Malynovskyy District Court of Odesa sentenced the applicant to 3 years and 3 months of imprisonment.

Source officielle

Page 83 sur 2955

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-72628

Admin. suprême

22 février 2006

22 février 2006

uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)10 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55466

Admin. suprême

2 mars 1989

2 mars 1989

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Öztürk case, delivered on 21 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55509

Admin. suprême

13 mai 1991

13 mai 1991

of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fredin case delivered on 18 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC000018510

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2010

18 mai 2010

On 2 February 2010 the Chamber decided to prolong this interim measure until 2 March 2010.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174331

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2017

17 mai 2017

On 9   February 2011 the Moskovskiy District Court of Kaliningrad found the search order lawful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52206

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } Final Resolution ResDH(2001)15 Human Rights Application No. 27572/95 Van Boerum against the Netherlands   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 26 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-220483

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2022

4 octobre 2022

The applicant’s appeal against this decision was dismissed by the ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal on 18   February 2021.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-240224

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2024

20 décembre 2024

On 27 February 2024, the Constitutional Court, without holding a hearing, dismissed the applicant’s appeal as unfounded (that decision was served on 11 March 2024).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250187

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2026

20 avril 2026

He was kept there against his will until 25 February 2014. On 27 March 2014 the applicant was again beaten by Mr L. On 19 May and 17 June 2016 he was threatened with death.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216336

Admin. suprême

18 février 2022

18 février 2022

sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 7 March 2022   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 2890/21 Zlatko BAGOJE against Montenegro lodged on 17 December 2020 communicated on 18 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55826

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 1996

13 septembre 1996

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Raimondo case delivered on 22 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56202

Admin. suprême

24 février 2003

24 février 2003

font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)42 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55497

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 1990

16 novembre 1990

and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Håkansson and Sturesson case delivered on 21 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116DEC004341415

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2020

16 janvier 2020

On 21 June 2018 and 14 February 2019 the Government submitted further observations in the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226103

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2023

29 juin 2023

On 2 February 2016 the Regional Governor issued an order by virtue of which another bidder was awarded the flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC004527816

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

By a letter dated 10 February 2022 sent to the applicant’s last known address, the applicant’s potential heirs were notified that the application had been restored to the Court’s list of cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229641

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2023

20 novembre 2023

That contractual dispute was decided by the Arbitration Committee of the TFF on 11 February 2021.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD000858205

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2007

14 juin 2007

He also unsuccessfully sought supervisory review of the judgment of 28   February 2000. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0406DEC000233964

Admin. suprême

6 avril 1967

6 avril 1967

February, 1963, the Disciplinary Prosecutor objected and thus prevented the setting aside of the suspension.   On ..

Source officielle