to rely on his cellmates for assistance with using the toilet, bathing and getting dressed or undressed contributes to its finding that the conditions of detention amount to degrading treatment (see Engel

    The Government As to the general interpretation of Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7, the Government were of the view that the classic Engel criteria - the domestic classification of the offence

leaves it to the competent national authorities to decide upon the relevance of proposed evidence insofar as is compatible with the concept of a fair trial which dominates the whole of Article 6 (see Engel

classification of the proceedings in domestic law, their essential nature, and the degree and severity of the potential penalty (see, among many other authorities on the concept of a “criminal charge”, Engel

Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 41; para. 98; Vereinigung Demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Gubi judgment of 19 December 1994, Series A no. 302, p. 16, para

   The Court has already had to determine a similar issue in two cases concerning military discipline (see the Engel and Others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22) and the maintenance of

of privilege of which Mr Demicoli was found guilty is to be regarded as "criminal" within the meaning of Article 6 (art. 6), the Court will apply the three criteria which were first laid down in the Engel

examination of every witness on the accused’s behalf, the essential aim of that provision, as indicated by the words “under the same conditions” is to ensure a full “equality of arms” in the matter (see Engel

Court HR, Engel v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 38, para. 91; Bricmont v. Belgium judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89; and Vidal v.

The Court recalls that in its admissibility decision of 30 May 2006 it established, in the light of the Engel criteria, that the applicant was facing a criminal charge.

24, § 10), intervals as long as these are far in excess of the limits laid down by Article 5 § 3 (art. 5-3), even taking due account of the exigencies of military life and military justice (see the Engel

" (see, mutatis mutandis, the above-mentioned Klass and Others judgment, Series A no. 28, pp. 25-26, para. 55) and "from which the whole Convention draws its inspiration" (see, mutatis mutandis, the Engel

  This is established in the case-law of the Convention by judgment in the case of Engel and others (Eur. Court H.R., judgment of 8.6.1986, Series A, no. 22).

Court H.R., Engel judgment of 8 June 1979, Series A no. 22, pp. 34 - 35, paras. 81 - 82; von Sydow v. Sweden, No. 11464/85, Dec. 12.5.87, D.R. 53, p. 85; Eur.

Its essential aim, as is indicated by the words 'under the same conditions', is a full 'equality of arms' in the matter (see the Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no

De rechter is in geen      enkel opzicht gebonden aan dat standpunt (het ambtsbericht).

Since the applicant had a clean record, he was given a mere admonition ( enkele waarschuwing ). C.     Civil proceedings 31.

  48522/10 Arjan Dhimertika (1961) Konde Dhimertika (1941) Engjell Dhimertika (1963) Jeta Dhimertika (1973) Evjeni Dhimertika (1938) Vasil Dhimertika (1958) Leonora Nika née Dhimertika (1962) Gëzim

As to the applicant’s Article 10 argument, the court referred to the analysis of the evidence and the law given by the District Judge which, it said, could not properly be chall enged. 2.