CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

11 119 résultats pour « Behague »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3187

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2006

27 juillet 2006

Article 5 Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention Unrecorded and unacknowledged detention in Chechnya: violation   Facts : The applicant, a Russian national in Ingushetia, complained on her own behalf

Source officielle

Page 83 sur 556

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1202DEC007430001

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2003

2 décembre 2003

The arrest report indicated that she was arrested on account of her involvement in conducting propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation, namely the PKK. The applicant signed the arrest report.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601DEC005525400

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2010

1 juin 2010

His widow, the second applicant, is the administrator of his estate on behalf of his legal heirs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126485

Admin. suprême

30 août 2013

30 août 2013

Specifically, the reasons provided were as follows: (a) 50 signatures were found to be invalid because they were collected on the applicant’s behalf by an active member of a municipality, in breach of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141743

Admin. suprême

13 février 2014

13 février 2014

Russia lodged on 1 April 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Leonidovich Yeliseyev, is a Belarusian national, who was born in 1967 and lives in Kalinkovichi, in the Gomel Region, Belarus

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177240

Admin. suprême

30 août 2017

30 août 2017

In June 2012, the Russian Ombudsman intervened on behalf of the Falun Gong movement and asked the Supreme Court of Russia to review the lower courts’ decisions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC004284012

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2017

17 octobre 2017

    On 15 September 2017 Mr Graber submitted an authority form signed by Mr Ilić on behalf of the applicant company authorising him to represent it before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154431

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2015

15 avril 2015

In support of their version of events, the applicant along with his co-defendants requested the trial judge to examine several other prisoners on their behalf as well as a doctor, who recorded the injuries

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159737

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2015

9 décembre 2015

On 15 March 2007 the applicant, acting on the company’s behalf, sent a written complaint, which was not made public, to the Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia alleging instances of corruption and bribery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC000552103

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2005

3 mai 2005

  He claimed restitution on his behalf and on behalf of the second applicant, who had originally owned one fourth of the property, and three successors in title to the other original co-owners.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0320JUD002695123

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2025

20 mars 2025

The applicant’s son, Mr   Oleksandr   Pavlovych Tymoshenko, has requested to pursue the application on his father’s behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244153

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2025

12 juin 2025

THE CASE The application concerns the impact of tax treatment on freedom of expression in a situation where a journalist’s legal expenses accrued in criminal proceedings against him were paid on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918DEC000890115

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2025

18 septembre 2025

Her son, Mr Mykola Mykolayovych Melnikov, expressed his wish to pursue the application on his late mother’s behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930DEC006714501

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2004

30 septembre 2004

The first-instance court dismissed the case brought on behalf of Ali Çenesiz, holding that the applicants' lawyer failed to submit a valid power of attorney authorising him to represent the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0202DEC000404269

Admin. suprême

2 février 1970

2 février 1970

respect, the Commission had consistently held that the provision of Article 6, paragraph (3) (d) (Art. 6-3-d), of the Convention does not give an accused person a general right to call witnesses on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1011DEC001666890

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 1990

11 octobre 1990

Finally, the applicant complains that due to the fact that the samples were destroyed he was not allowed to have witnesses from the medical research laboratories examined on his behalf regarding the outcome

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:003-3211479-3613112

Admin. suprême

26 août 2010

26 août 2010

France (n o 32476/06) Les requérants, Y.P., et son épouse, L.P., sont deux ressortissants du Belarus, nés respectivement en 1966 et 1967 et résidant actuellement clandestinement en France.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2762715-3025421

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2009

11 juin 2009

Its business consists of receiving, transmitting and executing orders for third parties and trading on its own behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316DEC000209111

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2017

16 mars 2017

In the present case, the Court considers that apart from explicitly expressing her wish to do so, the applicant’s mother has a sufficient legitimate interest in pursuing the proceedings on behalf of her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0910DEC002516618

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2019

10 septembre 2019

It is essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim, within the meaning of Article 34, on whose behalf they purport to

Source officielle