In February 2020, the SJC again found that there had been professional misconduct on the part of the applicant, with a majority of nine out of the twelve present members.

(b)     The Metz Court of Appeal’s judgments of 26 February 1991 16.

    The Government submitted their observations in respect of the first applicant on 1   February 1999, to which the applicant replied on 12 March 1999.

  In a letter of 11 February 1992 to the Registrar, the applicant's lawyer confirmed that his client and the Government had agreed a settlement.

On 15 February 1996 the Otwock District Court resumed the proceedings.

The most recent decision to resume the investigation was issued by the Chechnya Deputy Prosecutor on 7 February 2006.   2.

  2001 had been instituted on 26   February   2002. 9.

On 20   December 2007 the District Court extended the applicant’s detention until 8   February 2008.

    The events of 17 February 2014 The applicant was on duty between the evening of 16 February and the morning of 17 February 2014.

The applicant’s detention on remand was subsequently prolonged on 8 November 2007 (until 13 February 2008), 11 February 2008 (until 13 August 2008), 21 July 2008 (until 15 November 2008), 3 November 2008

    On 16 February 2008, when attempting to return to Russia, the applicant was detained by the Russian border control and held in custody until 22   February 2008.

    The third examination then lead to the applicant’s release under an   order of the Supreme Court of 22 February 2012, following his appeal against the decision of 3 February 2012 to

On 4   January and 22 February 2008 the Regional Court upheld the decisions of 29   December 2007 and 6 February 2008 in the applicant’s absence.

    On 10 February 2014 the Kirovskiy District Court of Saint ‑ Petersburg convicted the applicant. 13.

Belgium , 10 February 1983, § 32, Series A no.   58). 11.

on 1 February 2010.

On 12 February 2012 the applicant’s representative cancelled the authority.

On 23 February 1999, following a hearing held on 22 February 1999 in the course of which the applicant was represented by a lawyer, the Hague Regional Court rejected the applicant’s second appeal against

The proceedings D 33/99 lasted 5 years, because they were pending from February 1999 to February 2004.