Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606DEC005857214
6 juin 2019
6 juin 2019
The applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning his removal to Sudan was communicated to the Dutch Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130DEC004558218
30 janvier 2020
30 janvier 2020
Her complaint was communicated to the Dutch Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC002539214
10 avril 2018
10 avril 2018
The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.A.A. Böcker, and their Deputy Agent, Ms K. Adhin, both of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC006391317
4 septembre 2018
4 septembre 2018
The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms B. Koopman, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1124DEC006007421
24 novembre 2022
24 novembre 2022
The complaint was communicated to the Dutch Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55945
26 février 2001
26 février 2001
a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber; Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of the Netherlands would pay the applicant the sum of 2 000 Dutch
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504DEC002020919
4 mai 2023
4 mai 2023
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the refusal of the Court of Appeal to re-examine witness during the trial hearing were communicated to the Dutch Government
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0904DEC006241017
4 septembre 2025
4 septembre 2025
decision to grant the applicant anonymity under Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision by the President of the Section to grant leave to intervene to the AIRE Centre, the Dutch
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3289309-3671568
7 octobre 2010
7 octobre 2010
Publication has been made possible by a generous contribution from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC006623816
4 septembre 2018
4 septembre 2018
The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms B. Koopman, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68140-68608
7 mars 2000
7 mars 2000
xa0; Composition of the Court Elisabeth Palm (Swedish), President, Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Riza Türmen (Turkish), Boštjan Zupančič (Slovenian), Wilhelmina Thomassen (Dutch
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914DEC001813820
14 septembre 2023
14 septembre 2023
Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 April 2020, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Ronald Hogemann, is a Dutch
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC007260613
11 mars 2014
11 mars 2014
The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Ms L. Egmond, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7164
5 septembre 2000
5 septembre 2000
-1 Respect for family life Father unable to have his paternity recognised after mother’s death: admissible In 1986, the applicant, an Egyptian national, arrived in the Netherlands where he met R., a Dutch
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC000678106
10 mai 2011
10 mai 2011
The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.A.A. Böcker, of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-67982-68450
14 juin 1999
14 juin 1999
Icelandic), Corneliu Bîrsan (Romanian), Peer Lorenzen (Danish), Rait Maruste (Estonian), Judges , Feyyaz Gölcüklü , (Turkish), ad hoc Judge , Wilhelmina Thomassen (Dutch
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015DEC000733816
15 octobre 2020
15 octobre 2020
Guinea, there was a real risk that the second applicant would be subjected to female genital mutilation and that the first applicant would be forced to undergo re-circumcision, was communicated to the Dutch
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209612
31 mars 2021
31 mars 2021
The presentations of the applicant at the embassies of those respective countries, organised by the Dutch authorities, have up until now not resulted in the issuance of a laissez ‑ passer or other
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC002126213
27 mai 2014
27 mai 2014
The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms L. Egmond, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002378408
12 octobre 2010
12 octobre 2010
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Sunil Arunkoemar Siewnath, a Dutch
Source officiellePage 81 sur 240