CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118825
22 juin 2010
The Employment Tribunal awarded the applicant 58,585.80 GBP against the Dhanjis for unpaid wages, holiday pay, failure to provide employment particulars, non-pecuniary damage, failure to comply with the
Page 81 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD000058319
9 juin 2022
end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated domestically Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC006972011
9 décembre 2014
He argued, inter alia , that his company had suffered irreparable damage owing to the delay in the investigation.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 6
65166d54788aac83189ea11c
6 septembre 2023
La teneur de la pièce no 52 a été constatée par la cour et les parties. Il s'agit de la déclaration d'appel dont la société Granit Négoce avait connaissance.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1022JUD003555312
22 octobre 2018
Police Constable M.W. stated: “... that he had participated in the police action in Copenhagen on 10 October 2009 as a dog handler.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1217JUD004901799
17 décembre 2004
Did the Chief Constable know about the taxi driver’s statement, when he made this statement?
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0709JUD002432503
9 juillet 2009
On 26 August 2004 the applicant brought new proceedings for damages against the authorities of ZhH-385/5.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115DEC002432503
15 novembre 2007
On 26 August 2004 the applicant brought new proceedings for damages against the administration of ZhH-385/5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD002000906
20 janvier 2011
Damage 63. The applicant claimed 100,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609JUD003340102
9 juin 2009
Article 191 § 1 “Whoever, apart from the situations set out in law, threatens another person with severe and unjust damage will be sentenced to six months’ imprisonment.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618JUD005873714
18 juin 2024
It also concerns the publication of details concerning a civil claim for damages lodged by the applicant (including her full name) in the publicly accessible online judicial database; it further concerns
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0618DEC002019805
18 juin 2009
In this connection, the court found that the applicant had not established “manifest illegality” in his detention or shown that it had caused him irreparable damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC004596399
14 décembre 2004
The Communist Party's ultimate aim is the 'constant improvement of society'. The Communist Party is a party of a new type.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626JUD002595906
26 juin 2007
Such damages shall be covered by the Republic of Serbia or the public authority [in question].” 64.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD004239913
20 mars 2018
The Court reiterates its constant approach that it is in line with the object and purpose of Article 35 § 1 for the six-month time-limit to start running on the date of service of a copy
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC002855595
16 avril 1998
The House of Lords also recognised that prisoners had available an action in tort for damages against the authorities for damages for negligence where the intolerable conditions cause him to suffer injury
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD006138209
16 juillet 2013
to health, or moral suffering, or to pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage, shall be punished by unpaid work for the community during 150 to 180 hours, or a prison term of up to two years. (2)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD002266510
18 janvier 2022
Yerevan Mayor’s Office as an official election assistant of Levon Ter-Petrosyan, he instigated and organised mass disorder which involved mass violence, widespread massacre, arson, destruction and damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD003587208
26 avril 2016
Damage 85. The applicants claimed 500,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD005895409
19 novembre 2019
It has been the Court’s constant approach to regard the notion of an assembly as an autonomous concept (ibid.).