He had not heard the shots which had injured Yalçın Ercan because at that moment he had been wrestling with Yalçın’s brother Ergin.

The latter was no longer able to perform his duties as a defence lawyer because of illness. 17.

It was adjourned because some of the defendants failed to attend it.

    Around the same time as their relationship ended, V.C.A. got into an argument with one of the applicant’s male friends because V.C.A had become jealous of that friend.

The applicant explained that this was so because a foreign judgment could not have been enforced before it had been recognised in Croatia.

In the meantime, hearings set for 18 June and 3 July 1997, had been cancelled; the former because J.S., one of the applicant’s co-defendants, had failed to appear, the latter because the District Prosecutor

The commencement of the trial was scheduled for 25   November 1999 but was adjourned on three occasions because certain documents from the Prosecutor General’s Office were missing or because the presiding

It refused the appointment of Mr   Ratushniy and Ms Gagarina because they had not produced written authority to act. 24.

He complained that the decision had amounted to a ban on the picket because the authorities had not suggested any alternative venue or time for it.

They were adjourned because the second applicant’s lawyer failed to appear. 64.

She was therefore practically blaming the President of the Court of Cassation simply because she had worked as a prosecutor during communism.

Criminal proceedings in this connection were discontinued by the public prosecutor in November 2013 because the applicant’s guilt was considered to be of a minor nature and because prosecution was not

Nonetheless, the High Court held that they were protected by qualified privilege because the allegations were of legitimate interest and because the defendants were entitled to repeat the information given

Another risk factor was hereditary, because the applicant’s father had had myocardial infarction. 16.

Several adjournments occurred because the presiding judge was sitting in another case.

The court ruled that there was no need to appoint Mr Niessner as a second expert, because he had already submitted a report on the quality of the wine, which he had analysed as a private expert, and because

However, the applicant was unable to enforce that judgment because company A. had no assets.

She did not pass the letter on to the applicant because the two of them were not on close terms. 28 .

because the victims did not attend, and one was adjourned because it was necessary to serve the applicant with a copy of the indictment act in the Tyvan language. 22 .