CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911JUD005196799
11 septembre 2007
in a comatose state.
Page 80 sur 194
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD002935922
27 février 2025
The report produced specifies that the examination followed a request made by PSPS owing to what was described as the applicant’s inadequate reactions at school.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004JUD002936595
4 octobre 2005
indivisible unity of the State. 12.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0207DEC000314767
7 février 1968
The applicant company appealed to the Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) Stuttgart. By its judgment of .. October, 1966, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with costs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0222JUD002660604
22 février 2007
The fact that political will is needed for the justice system to start working properly is frankly unacceptable.” 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0527JUD004342598
27 mai 2003
intention of insulting the Regional Court as a State authority.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000220407
20 octobre 2016
It is not clear from submissions by the parties and other available material what was the scope of the authority conveyed under the domestic legal order to the municipal guard officers and what were the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1013DEC001120784
13 octobre 1986
He states that the mass media in Denmark have supported his opponents.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC006220800
8 janvier 2004
He noted that the Government had only provided data on the sanitary state of Cell no. 18 but not Cells nos. 49 and 16, which were smaller.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC007088301
9 juillet 2002
Insofar as the impugned statement was concerned, A.S. had stated that he could not remember having expressed such a view.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167730
19 septembre 2016
statements.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0731JUD007268301
31 juillet 2007
The word “abnormal” had obviously referred to the acts of Governor Rutskoy as a State official and public figure.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0907DEC001748890
7 septembre 1993
While it heard counsel for the publisher and the applicant's employer, it refused to hear applicant's counsel since the applicant was in continuing contempt.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD005391811
19 janvier 2021
This obligation is not confined to cases where it has been established that the death was caused by an agent of the State.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0224JUD006257809
24 février 2015
The applicant argued that the investigation had not been effective from the start.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108DEC003077714
8 janvier 2019
The applicant, together with two other individuals, attempted to find the children, while P.I.N. followed her by car. 16 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0312DEC003701497
12 mars 1998
On 23 November 1994 two of the applicant's cell members were arrested while distributing pamphlets.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0901JUD002406213
1 septembre 2016
The applicant was obviously in an exceptional mental state.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1119DEC001613308
19 novembre 2009
state bodies responsible for privatisation of State property.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002956795
16 octobre 1996
Moreover, according to the applicant's statements, he had occasionally taken care of Marjut.