CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD000979812
29 juin 2021
In December 2014 the applicant filed a lawsuit against the detention authorities seeking to declare unlawful the practice of marking the prison uniform with words “life imprisonment” and
Page 80 sur 81
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1221JUD006151300
21 décembre 2004
According to the applicant, he had been dismissed from the weekly “Express” after the lawsuit and he paid the sums awarded in instalments over a period of three years. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0320JUD001533902
20 mars 2008
On 20 December 2000 the Department of Disaster Relief of the Elbrus District issued a written statement, apparently in connection with individual lawsuits, that it had received no advance
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0212JUD004728799
12 février 2004
She said that her children had come to see her about a lawsuit between them concerning the non-payment of maintenance to which she was entitled because of her ill-health.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD000315005
17 juillet 2007
Finally, the Government maintained that the Convention was directly applicable in the respondent State's legal system, that the applicants had failed to bring a separate civil lawsuit under Articles 199
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD006090811
24 juillet 2014
The first publicly available – though not publicly disseminated – information concerning the fatal consequences of asbestos at MDC appears to be the judicial acts and judgment relating to a lawsuit
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921DEC004566199
21 septembre 2004
He complained that under Romanian law a victim could only in limited circumstances pursue a claim for civil damages in a separate lawsuit from the criminal trial and that in his case, in the absence of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410JUD002613704
10 avril 2007
the fact that in previous cases where the Court had found Hungary to have violated Article 3, the Government did not argue nor did the Court find that, by not attempting to obtain redress in a civil lawsuit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419JUD000647708
19 avril 2018
person holding a university degree in law could provide, on the basis of a special permit granted by the Ministry of Justice, various legal services, including legal consultation; the drafting of lawsuits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624JUD004608421
24 juin 2025
may be the subject of an administrative legal dispute if a party directly affected by the administrative act has exhausted the statutory administrative remedies against the disputed act, or [if] the lawsuit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0526JUD002761704
26 mai 2011
On 11 May 2004 the applicant filed a civil lawsuit with the Kraków Regional Court against doctors S.B., G.S. and K.R. and against the Krakow and T. hospitals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD004287510
3 septembre 2015
In other instances of civil litigation, what is objectively at stake in the lawsuit has little or no connection to the subjectivity (personality) of the defendant. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624JUD000498624
Once the mediation proceedings were finalised, on 19 January 2019, C proceeded to file a lawsuit against the first applicant, before the Family Court, which was assigned to Judge F. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0301JUD007824113
1 mars 2018
Selami and the applicants submitted two separate lawsuits, one in relation to his unlawful detention and one in relation to his physical ill-treatment by the police, claiming pecuniary and non-pecuniary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108DEC005512009
8 novembre 2011
Duty to pay court fees At the material time, the fee for filing a lawsuit before a City Court or a District Court ( tingrett ) was 4,300 Norwegian kroner (“NOK”), corresponding to approximately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC005655610
27 janvier 2015
even though the condition of the person/s who requested it or for whom medical assistance was requested required such intervention. (4) Damages shall include potential expenses incurred by a lawsuit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD003013204
9 octobre 2007
Finally, the applicant had failed to bring a separate civil lawsuit under Article 25 of the Constitution (see paragraphs 45-47 above). 60.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD001652805
10 juillet 2008
On 7 July 2004 the applicant filed a lawsuit with the Sabayil District Court complaining of the unlawfulness of the prosecutor’s actions and requesting the court to discontinue the proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329JUD005008406
29 mars 2011
This number appeared all the more insufficient as only one lawsuit had been brought against the doctor concerned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0406JUD000543417
6 avril 2021
passages of that provision read as follows: “The Constitutional Court pronounces on the unconstitutionality 1. of laws ... d) upon application by an individual claiming that his/her rights as a party to a lawsuit