He had declared his minor age at some point after his arrival and there was no indication that his claims that he had been a minor had been unfounded or unreasonable.

had not conducted an effective investigation into his allegations.

sentences – it did not appear that the reasons they had previously given had been “unreasonable”, including when they had refused to follow the favourable opinions of the prison authorities in 2001.

Those judges had sought to recuse themselves from sitting in the case, which proved that they had had a preconceived idea about the case. THE LAW 21.

had lasted several hours.

It was noted, in particular, that SG had used his gun in accordance with instructions, had targeted the wheels of the car and had had recourse to his firearm only after the driver had committed a crime

Since the applicant had behaved violently, the officers had used force to overpower him.

The police officers, including those who had come to the aid of the two officers, had tried to calm the applicants but the latter had punched and kicked them and, as a result, had been taken into custody

(ii)     Application – The employment courts had identified the various interests at stake and had found that the installation of the video-surveillance had been justified by legitimate reasons

not claimed that the criminal courts had considered facts of which they had had no knowledge and in respect of which they had not been heard.

According to him, the police officers had had to use force against the robbers because they had had a sawn-off shotgun and had resisted arrest ...” 25 .

(d)     The IQC had had full access to all of the classified documents from which the facts the applicant had been informed of had been derived.

before the board, they had been of no effect because the board played a merely consultative role and the proceedings before it had been internal and administrative in nature.

In spite of the agreement that had been reached, the bank had the property sold at auction. Notice of the auction was not given to the applicant, who had moved house in the meantime.

had therefore become devoid of object.

The interference had been prescribed by law and had pursued the legitimate aim of protecting the reputation of others.

The police went on to note that the enquiries revealed that D. was prone to alcohol abuse, had ties with antisocial elements, had been having quarrels with her relatives, and had already on a previous

The discontinuation decision taken in 1985, which had not been formally communicated to the applicant, had not ended the running of the period that had started in January 1978.

R.R. had been a public figure both in his own region in the Azores and in the entire country and, at the time the reports had been broadcast, he had held a high-level political appointment.