However, she never extended her action so as also to challenge the decision of 26 October 1992.

The applicant challenged that official's participation as he had been removed from an earlier case concerning him.

France - 19632/92 Judgment 21.2.1997 Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of proceedings to challenge expropriation and to secure compensation: violation Article 1 of

In addition, it would have been open to Air Canada to have instituted judicial review proceedings to challenge the failure of the Commissioners to provide reasons for the seizure of the aircraft.

On 28 September 2016 the applicant lodged an individual appeal with the Constitutional Court to challenge his dismissal. The appeal is still pending.

It advised the applicant that the decision could not be challenged on appeal, but that he could lodge an administrative action with the Administrative Court ( Upravni sud Republike Hrvatske ).

The applicant challenged them before the Czech Constitutional Court in three separate constitutional appeals which were, however, rejected as having been lodged outside the one-year statutory time limit

On 18 November 2019 the applicant challenged the impartiality of judge D.C. She claimed that the judge had been biased against her because of her sexual orientation.

The applicant challenged that decision pointing out that DTP members mentioned by name in the article had been marked as targets on account of their political opinions.

The applicant challenged this decision. He complained that he had never been served with the decision that had initiated the proceedings nor with the decision declaring him jointly liable.

The applicant challenged the judge for bias, it being common knowledge that they were not on good terms with each other, and because the judge had taken part in political activities incompatible with his

The applicants challenged the Speaker’s decisions before the Immunity Committee.

Based on this information, the applicant challenged the lay assessor judges sitting in his case arguing that they did not meet the requirements for a lawfully appointed judge ( zákonný sudca ).

In addition, it would have been open to Air Canada to have instituted judicial review proceedings to challenge the failure of the Commissioners to provide reasons for the seizure of the aircraft.

Defence counsel had been given the opportunity to investigate and clarify the police officers’ connections with the case and had not challenged the continued presence of the jurors throughout the proceedings

Une note en délibéré à été produite le 3 septembre 2023 pour la société par actions simplifiée Challenges IV. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

janvier 1985 par lequel le tribunal administratif de Nantes a rejeté sa demande tendant à ce que l'Etat soit condamné à lui verser une indemnité de 430 558 F en réparation du préjudice subi par son chaland

    The Supreme Court rejected the challenge.

The applicant challenged the decision before the hierarchically superior prosecutor. 52.