The Court therefore concluded that there had been a violation of Article 3 in that no effective investigation had been undertaken into the applicant’s claim that he was ill-treated in police custody

She has also been refusing to collect any notices or decisions sent to her by the court.

    According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of her costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred

The decisions had been taken in order to protect the witnesses and victims in a number of sets of criminal proceedings against the applicant, and as such the censorship had been justified by the second

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 20.

reflect the truth as he had been coerced and threatened by the police officers.

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 19.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

    According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred

Berro-Lefevre, judges, and Mr V. Berger , Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 October 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

The Court further stressed that the fact that the applicant had been acquitted in the criminal proceedings had no bearing on his claim that he had been prosecuted twice for the same offence, nor did it

of his detention had been “inhuman”, without any further specification; -   that his lawyers’ performance had been poor; -   that he had had no opportunity to bring proceedings against those

  The Court held: by six votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights; unanimously, that there had been

They relied, among other grounds, on the fact that the family S had been using the flat, as their home, for decades; that the flat had already been burdened with an occupancy right when the applicant’s

The applicant submitted that the decision of 25 June 2009 had been appealed against.

Gerhard Ingold, est un ressortissant suisse né en 1951 et résidant à Kirchberg, dans le canton de Berne. Il est représenté devant la Cour par M e B. Luginbühl, avocat à Berne. 2.

#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ftehim bilaterali ta’ investiment konkluż fl‑1991 bejn ir-Renju tal-Pajjiżi l-Baxxi u r-Repubblika Federali Ċeka u Slovakka u li għadu applikabbli bejn ir-Renju tal-Pajjiżi

The Court concluded that the interference with Mr Uzun’s right to respect for his private life had been in accordance with the law.

  He also consulted the file concerning his case and made phone calls with a lawyer and with an official of the PTT telecommunications administration in Berne.