Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0407DEC006626517
7 avril 2022
7 avril 2022
The applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the impossibility for him to examine a witness on his behalf was communicated to the Armenian Government (“the Government”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018DEC005583007
18 octobre 2016
18 octobre 2016
By letter dated 2 December 2015, the applicant was informed that his then representative could no longer act on his behalf and the applicant was asked to appoint another representative by 15 January 2016
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC002470208
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC000987314
8 avril 2021
8 avril 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No observations were received from the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209DEC000044712
9 février 2016
9 février 2016
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203DEC004313220
3 février 2022
3 février 2022
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404DEC003858706
4 avril 2019
4 avril 2019
they wished to pursue the application in the late applicant’s stead and that Mr Filippo Serino had been conferred a general power of attorney by his sister Mrs Lucia Serino to act on her behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221122
25 octobre 2022
25 octobre 2022
Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicants complain of an unjustified delay on behalf of the administration to comply with judgment no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216725
9 mars 2022
9 mars 2022
The Bulgarian Ministry of Justice, acting as the Central Authority within the meaning of the Hague Convention, received the applicant’s request on 5 August 2019 and instituted proceedings on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404DEC000154820
4 avril 2024
4 avril 2024
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237921
7 octobre 2024
7 octobre 2024
It found the complaints raised by the first applicant manifestly ill-founded and rejected the complaints raised on behalf of the second applicant for lack of standing on account of conflict of interest
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519DEC003418220
19 mai 2022
19 mai 2022
By the letter of 16 April 2021, the applicant’s representative was invited to submit the observations on behalf of the applicant, together with any claims for just satisfaction.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216414
22 février 2022
22 février 2022
In that appeal she criticised the court for rejecting the claim she had lodged on behalf of her client after an alleged prolonged inactivity of judge M.P.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC002072207
24 mars 2015
24 mars 2015
On 23 June 2014 the observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216726
9 mars 2022
9 mars 2022
The Bulgarian Ministry of Justice, acting as the Central Authority within the meaning of the Hague Convention, received the applicant’s request on 10 August 2020 and instituted proceedings on behalf of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237819
4 octobre 2024
4 octobre 2024
MĂRGINEANU ALEXANDRU-VALENTIN against Romania lodged on 4 April 2022 communicated on 4 October 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application was lodged by a physician on behalf of his private individual
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cbd4bd3db21cbdd8e6b2
17 octobre 2011
17 octobre 2011
née le 13 Février 1963 à MINSK (BELARUS) ... 01600 MASSIEUX représentée par la SCP BAUFUME-SOURBE, avoués à la Cour assistée de Me François TEBIB, avocat au barreau de l'AIN Date de clôture
Source officielleciv3
6137222dcd580146773fadd4
23 février 1994
23 février 1994
Jacques Z..., demeurant cité de la Benauge, bât 2, 35-15, rue du recteur Thamin à Bordeaux (Gironde), 6 / M. D... Peigne, demeurant ...
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177112
25 août 2017
25 août 2017
violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention on account of the alleged inability of the applicant to examine witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf
Source officielleEloignement 72 heures
DTA_2402754_20240426
26 avril 2024
26 avril 2024
A par un pli recommandé avec accusé de réception présenté le 22 décembre 2023 au 44, rue de la Benauge à Bordeaux (33 000), dont il n'est pas contesté qu'elle est la dernière adresse connue par l'administration
Source officiellePage 80 sur 556