Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party

. 2, Hambourg (Allemagne), défenderesses à la cassation ; La demanderesse invoque, à l'appui de son pourvoi, le moyen unique de cassation annexé au présent arrêt ; LA COUR, composée selon l'article

    Since the question of the application of Article 41 of the Convention was not ready for decision, the Court reserved it and invited the Government and the applicants to submit, within three

professionnelle WAQUET, FARGE et HAZAN, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général LE DIMNA ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation des articles

EN DROIT SUR L’APPLICATION DE L’ARTICLE   41 DE LA CONVENTION 6.

    Under Article 41 of the Convention, the applicants sought just satisfaction consisting of the restitution of the property which remained unused.

Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable)

Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable)

Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable)

Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable)

Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable)

Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable)

    Under Article 41 of the Convention the applicant sought the following by way of just satisfaction: in respect of pecuniary damage, a sum of money corresponding to the sums paid and payable

They each filed observations under Article 41. 6.     The applicants were represented by Mr M. Ekimdzhiev and Ms   K.   Boncheva, lawyers practising in Plovdiv, and Ms E.

Since, as regards pecuniary damage, the question of the application of Article 41 of the Convention was not ready for decision, the Court reserved it and invited the Government and the applicant to submit

    Since the question of the application of Article 41 of the Convention concerning the pecuniary damage was not ready for decision, the Court reserved it and invited the Government and the

    Under Article 41 of the Convention, the applicants sought compensation in respect of both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.

    Since the question of the application of Article 41 of the Convention was not ready for decision as regards pecuniary damage, in part, the Court reserved it and invited the Government and

    Since the question of the application of Article   41 of the Convention was not ready for decision, the Court reserved it and invited the Government and the applicant company to submit