CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD002002804
13 novembre 2008
She made no claims in respect of the pecuniary damage caused to her as a result of the non-enforcement of the judgment of 19 December 2002.
Page 8 sur 65
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC001162602
8 juillet 2004
He also sought an injunction to stop dissemination of the book, recall all printed copies and make necessary corrections.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709JUD005137920
9 juillet 2024
It finds that, as established by the domestic court, the applicant was made to bear a disproportionate burden.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0503JUD004455413
3 mai 2018
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD002718708
14 novembre 2023
On the same date he made statements to the police as a person accused of aggravated murder, in the absence of a lawyer.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224541
6 avril 2023
On 29 September 2022 the mother made an official request to the Moldovan authorities to cancel the travel documents of the second and fourth applicants.
ECLI:CEDH:001-224599
5 avril 2023
medical assistance (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC000692206
27 septembre 2011
regard to the above application lodged on 27 January 2006, Having regard to the comments submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Valentina
ECLI:CEDH:001-157384
28 août 2015
Ivanovna MIRONOVA against Russia lodged on 15 June 2014 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Ms Valentina Ivanovna Mironova, is a Russian national, who was born in 1963 and who lives in Tolmachevo, a village
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1001DEC004813609
1 octobre 2015
{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no 48136/09 Valentina-Ionela
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD000082521
The Court has already made relevant considerations related to the Constitutional Court’s effectiveness for the period until 2018 in Cauchi v. Malta (no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-218171
1 juin 2022
water or shelter and without access to proper medical assistance (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0901JUD007260813
1 septembre 2022
Following her insistence on being received by the prosecutor, the latter called the police to make her leave the building of the Sabunchu District Prosecutor’s Office.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312JUD002652215
12 mars 2026
The general principles to be applied in cases where a prosecution witness did not attend the trial and his statements previously made by him were admitted as evidence are well-established
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214DEC001894510
14 décembre 2021
THE LAW The applicant, a member of the political opposition who was found guilty of incitement of a violent overthrow of the government and a violent change of the constitutional order in his speeches made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD002135019
2 avril 2026
ECLI:CEDH:001-211553
5 juillet 2021
Russia 15/10/2020 Marina Vitalyevna CHEBYKINA 1990 Kaluga Andrey RUDOV Before and during the divorce proceedings the applicant’s (former) husband made death threats against her which the police refused
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD000456307
17 décembre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC004123298
13 septembre 2001
Valenti, a lawyer practising in Rome. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows: The applicant is the owner of an apartment in Rome, which she had let to A.B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210JUD003224114
10 décembre 2024
not be made by the Court.