While in the Konotop hospital, K. was granted early release from serving his sentence, pursuant to a decision of the Konotop Court of 8 December 2009. 5.

What confessions and/or statements ( явка с повинной; показания ) did the applicant give during that period (please submit relevant documents, in particular, written, audio or video records containing

  The applicants complained to the prosecutor that they had been ill-treated while in police custody.

  The Court considered that there were two possible explanations for what happened.

The meetings were to start on 15 March 1999 at the latest.

     This decision was confirmed by the Stuttgart Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) on 6 March 1978.

While recognising that the case was a complex one on account of the number of victims, the Court noted that only five individuals had been prosecuted and that the experts’ reports determining the defects

    The witnesses’ statements (a)     V.L.’s statements V.L. gave a written statement immediately after the incident confirming the police officers’ version.

He may, if he chooses, make a voluntary statement but that is taken by officers not involved in the inquiry.

  When the presiding judge takes the floor in accordance with these rules the clerk of the court shall be called and enter the important parts of the statements in (the records) of which the state

14 above), despite apparently deciding from the very start on the need to hear both children.

COMPLAINTS   The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that he had been force-fed while on hunger strike to protest against his protracted detention.

  She challenged the decision to close the case, complaining in particular that she was unsure whether the body – in an advanced state of decomposition – she had been asked to identify had been her

    While detained at Biržai police station, M.P. was kept in cell no.

The applicant had been able to communicate with the lawyer for only fifteen minutes, immediately before the start of the hearing.

The applicants, Ukrainian nationals of Roma ethnicity, were advised by the mayor and the local police to leave the village, as a “pogrom” was about to start.

    On 13 March 1998, upon finding out that he had not been attached to the Retirement Fund while serving as a director general at Asil Çelik, the applicant lodged an application with the General

  While the applicant was in hospital, she was visited by a police officer, to whom she explained what had happened and signed a declaration, asking “to take lawful measures against [A.]”. 4 .

It was the prosecution’s case that after 2002 the applicants had developed in the United Kingdom a Ponzi scheme referred to as the “Dobbs White” scheme.