CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD005781300
3 novembre 2011
Stormann, G. Doujak , conseillers ; – pour les requérants M es H.F. Kinz , W.L. Weh conseils , MM. S. Harg , C.
Page 8 sur 9
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0528JUD007627311
28 mai 2020
of their liberty without a judicial warrant had contravened the domestic legislation and had thus been incompatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Strogan
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0523JUD005285519
23 mai 2024
Furthermore, specific grounds justifying the application of one of the exceptions that it listed exhaustively had to be established unequivocally at the time of the taking of such a measure (see Strogan
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:SO00026
15 janvier 2014
communication risquant de mettre en péril les intérêts des clients ainsi que d'une absence de relations avec les autres associés ; qu'en témoigne l'attestation rédigée par Mme Albane G... concernant le dossier Stromag
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0624JUD003014104
24 juin 2010
Stormann, ministère fédéral de la Justice, conseillers ; – pour les requérants MM. K. Mayer , conseil, H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001910311
17 décembre 2019
Indeed, the Court has found pre-investigation inquiries to be incompatible with the standards of an effective remedy (see Strogan v. Ukraine , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD002078914
10 juin 2021
the inquiring officer could only take a limited number of steps and the victim had no formal status, meaning his or her effective participation in the procedure was excluded (see, mutatis mutandis , Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0305JUD005047420
5 mars 2026
39884/05, § 80, 19 January 2012, Strogan v. Ukraine , no. 30198/11, §§ 107-10, 6 October 2016, and Rytikov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001988609
effective remedy, because an inquiring officer can only take a limited number of steps and a victim has no formal status, meaning that his or her effective participation in the procedure is excluded (see Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD004058315
15 décembre 2016
with reference to a number of other relevant factors which may either confirm the existence of a danger of absconding or make it appear so slight that it cannot justify detention pending trial (see Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024JUD002296411
24 octobre 2019
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
Stormann , Mr G. Doujak , Advisers ; (b) for the applicants Mr H.F. Kinz , M W.L. Weh , Counsel , Mr S. Harg , Mr C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD005781300
1 avril 2010
There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Ms B. ohms , Deputy Agent , Ms B. grosse , Mr M. stormann , Ms I. hager-ruhs , Advisers ;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0216JUD001840407
16 février 2017
However, in the Court’s opinion, it should not have affected the thoroughness of the investigation which the authorities were obliged to ensure (see Strogan v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0320DEC005262099
20 mars 2003
The first applicant is a storeman. He was member of a trade union, henceforth called SID, from September 1979 until he resigned membership in 1984.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004889899
6 mai 2003
Today he’s the chairman of Parliament’s anti-Mafia committee, the great choreographer of the to-ing and fro-ing of the pentiti [criminals-turned-informers] and the PDS’s strongman.
Stormann , Federal Ministry of Justice, Advisers ; (b) for the applicants Mr K. Mayer , Counsel , Mr H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD003419909
20 juin 2019
23893/03, § 45, 15 May 2012) as regards pre-investigation inquiries and in Strogan v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0718JUD005692010
18 juillet 2019
The State’s failure to discharge that burden of proof may prompt the Court to accept the applicant’s account of events (see Strogan v. Ukraine , no. 30198/11, § 73, 6 October 2016). 75.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007
19 février 2013
Stormann, Federal Ministry of Justice, Ms A. J ankovic, Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Advisers ; (b) for the applicants Mr H.