On 11 September 1991 the asylum request was refused by the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk), considering that the first applicant had never been

        On 22 January 1991 the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) refused the applicant asylum in Sweden.

  Fishery conservation areas cannot simply replace free fishing with hand-held tackle.

Sten De Geer, a lawyer practising in Stockholm.         The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

In conclusion, [the court] finds that even if [the applicant] now wants to give up his abuse, the necessary care cannot be ensured voluntarily.

        On 22 April 1992 the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) decided to send the applicant back to France for the following reasons:     

        On 5 April 1991 the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk) decided not to take any decision of its own on the request for asylum but to refer the matter

By submissions received on 24   January 2011, the Court was informed that Mr Stefan Arsovski had died on 26 March 2007.

In these circumstances the national pension cannot be considered a pension earned by the pensioner himself, but a public benefit.

Where immigration is concerned, Article 8 of the Convention cannot be considered to impose on a State a general obligation to authorise family reunion in its territory.

The Government cannot be held responsible for measures affecting the applicants at a later stage in Sweden.

The Government cannot be held responsible for measures affecting the applicants at a later stage in Sweden.

       By decision of 18 and 25 July 1995, the Provincial Executive (Gedeputeerde Staten) of the province of Gelderland adopted - pursuant to Article 4 para. 3 of the Delta Act

       On 29 October 1992 the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) rejected the applicants' request.

       On 24 June 1991 the Mayor and Aldermen rejected the objection and the applicant filed an appeal with the Provincial Executive (Provinciale Staten) of Zuid-Holland.

This was rejected by the National Immigration Board (Statens Invandrarverk, the "SIV") in May 1993 and he was requested to leave the country.

52074/99) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Stefan

the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;        (e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot

Iain Burnett, Counsel, and Messrs Clive Osborne and Steven Crunkhorn as advisers. The applicant was represented by Mr. Rick Scannell, Counsel, Mr. Jawaid Luqmani, Solicitor, and Ms.

Deze heeft gelegenheid      gehad om deze getuigen de vragen te stellen die hij in het belang      van de verdediging achtte.