executive authorities, specifically the Prefect’s Office of the Central District of Moscow, voiced opinions against the detention of Alexey Navalnyy, shouted slogans, blocked the entrance to the Okhotnyy Ryad

Pierre EW..., demeurant Ryad B... BP 5794, 182°/ de M. Pierre DX..., 183°/ de Mme Yvonne ZA... épouse DX..., demeurant ensemble ... (11ème), 184°/ de M.

  25147/09, §§   22-24, 26   January 2017; OOO   Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no.

était représentée en Arabie Saoudite par une société Sofresa internal Saudi Arabia Limited (SISA), filiale de droit saoudien de Sofresa, créée le 15 octobre 2001, inscrite au registre du commerce de Ryad

Russie , n o   25147/09, §§   18 ‑ 25, 26   janvier 2017, OOO   Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad c.

Ryad Ghaoui («   le requérant   ») a saisi la Cour en vertu de l’article   34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales («   la Convention &

  25147/09 , §§   22-24, 26 January 2017; OOO   Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no.   39748/05 , §   46, 25   April 2017; Novaya Gazeta and Milashina v.

(i)     Questioning of Mr Si., Mr Ry.and Mr D.K. on 20 March 2008 57 .

  25147/09, §§ 22-24, 26 January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no. 39748/05, §   46, 25 April 2017; Cheltsova v.

  25147/09, §§ 22-24, 26 January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no. 39748/05, §   46, 25 April 2017; and Cheltsova , cited above, § 100).

although sarcastic, remained within the acceptable degree of stylistic exaggeration employed to express the journalist’s value judgment (see, mutatis mutandis , OOO   Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad

  25147/09, §§   22-24, 26   January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v.   Russia , no.   39748/05, §   46, 25 April 2017; Cheltsova v.

  25147/09, §§   22-24, 26   January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v.   Russia , no.

  25147/09, §§ 22-24, 26 January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no. 39748/05, §   46, 25 April 2017; Cheltsova v.   Russia , no.

  25147/09, §§ 22-24, 26   January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v. Russia , no.   39748/05, §   46, 25 April 2017; and Cheltsova v.

. – that pedestrian and vehicle traffic at the location chosen by the organiser of the public event (Okhotnyy Ryad Street in Moscow) is heavy.

; per se   incompatible with freedom of opinion, a fundamental element of Article 10 of the Convention (see   Azadliq and Zayidov , cited above, § 46, and OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad

, in particular, that a meeting would be held at 12 noon on 14 April 2007 in Novopushkinskiy Park, which would last until 1.30 p.m. and would be followed by a march via Tverskaya Street and Okhotnyy Ryad

  25147/09, §§   22-24, 26 January 2017; OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvartirnyy Ryad v.