CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

24 588 résultats pour « Marc FINKINE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192722

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2019

28 mars 2019

2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 28857/14 Pavel RÎBAC and RODINA-AGRO S.A. against the Republic of Moldova and Russia lodged on 31 March 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns

Source officielle

Page 8 sur 1230

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3723

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2005

6 octobre 2005

Observation : The Act of 4 March 2002, which entered into force on 7 March 2002, had deprived the applicants of the possibility of obtaining compensation for the “special burdens” arising from their child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD005781809

Admin. suprême

7 février 2017

7 février 2017

    On 9 April 2010 the Tverskoy District Court rejected the applicants’ complaints, finding that the decision of 12   March 2010 had been lawful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC004123298

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2001

13 septembre 2001

Between 4 March 1994 and 11 November 1997, the bailiff made thirteen   attempts to recover possession.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235986

Admin. suprême

27 août 2024

27 août 2024

Switzerland [GC], no. 51357/07, §   115, 15   March 2018)?   2.     Did the applicant have a fair hearing, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD005337299

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

In its finding the Constitutional Court found that the case was not complex and that no delays could be imputed to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0327JUD001224486

Admin. suprême

27 mars 1991

27 mars 1991

Eissen , Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 20 February and 21 March 1991, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE AND FACTS 1.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

6137242ecd5801467741347e

Cassation

29 janvier 2004

29 janvier 2004

renvoie devant la cour d'appel de Versailles, autrement composée ; Condamne les défendeurs aux dépens ; Vu l'article 700 du nouveau Code de procédure civile, rejette les demandes de la société Finin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0907DEC001456189

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1995

7 septembre 1995

        On 22 March 1985 the Director of Agriculture and Food Supply of the province of Zuid-Holland rejected the applicants' request, finding that the applicants' investment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231659

Admin. suprême

21 février 2024

21 février 2024

He submitted, in particular, that the court had based its decision on the findings made by the Commission.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203739

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2020

19 juin 2020

On 18   March 2017 the applicant hit M. with his car causing her death. On an unspecified date the applicant was charged with manslaughter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177330

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2017

8 septembre 2017

On 10   March 2011 the Cracow Regional Court dismissed the complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223727

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2023

9 mars 2023

Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)35 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Navalnyy and Ofitserov group against Russian Federation   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD001361012

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2021

15 juin 2021

    The applicant contested the findings made by the Court of Appeal regarding his lawyer’s absence and the content of the submitted transcripts, alleging that it was only on 15 March 2012, around

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503JUD007851011

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

    The Court rejects the Government’s objection, finding that the applicant had raised that complaint in her appeal to the Court of Cassation. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242615

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2025

6 mars 2025

The judgments in the applicant’s favour were rendered on various dates between January 2003 and March 2015.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2404186-2597584

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2008

26 juin 2008

After spending several hours at the police station, the applicant was subsequently transferred, under escort, to the police station in Sânnicolau Mare; at about 9 p.m. he was taken by police officers to

Source officielle
CC

civ2

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:C200453

Cassation

19 mars 2015

19 mars 2015

, du décret n° 2004-1463 du 23 décembre 2004 ; Attendu que Mme X... a sollicité son inscription sur la liste des experts judiciaires de la cour d'appel de Paris en tant qu'interprète en langue finnoise

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-695892-703603

Admin. suprême

6 février 2003

6 février 2003

On 19 March 1999 the Turkish Cabinet issued a decree for the applicants’ extradition. On 23 March 1999, the Court decided to extend the interim measure until further notice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233069

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2024

12 mars 2024

sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 2 April 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 44291/20 Ion-Bogdan MITRACHE against Romania lodged on 5 October 2020 communicated on 12 March

Source officielle