13 November 2023   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a civil dispute between the applicant (the former leader of the “Solidarity” trade union, former President of Poland and laureate

regard to the above application lodged on 30 May 2015, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.

Having considered the Government’s objection, the Court rejects it. THE FACTS 3.     The applicant was born in 1958 and lives in Istanbul. The applicant was represented by Ms B.

Trebolle Lafuente, of the Saragossa Bar. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. A.     The circumstances of the case 1.

    The conviction of Mr Lindon and Mr Otchakovsky-Laurens (application no. 21279/02) 1.     The publication of the novel “Jean-Marie Le Pen on Trial” 10.

    On 3   May 2005, having been informed that an article was about to appear in Paris   Match , Prince Albert served notice on the applicants to refrain from publishing the article

Switzerland (no. 38223/97) The applicant, Pol Laurent Minjat, is a Swiss national.

    The Regional Court, referring to Article 70 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, having informed the applicant of its view regarding his duty to testify and having heard him, thereupon

under Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.

As regards the sentence, the court found that, having regard to the circumstances of the case, a fine would be the most appropriate penalty.

Early, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 6 September 2005, Having regard to the decision to examine the admissibility and merits of the case together (Article 29 § 3

Berger , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 December 1998, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted

Décision déférée à la Cour : jugement du 10 mars 2010 -Tribunal de Grande Instance de PARIS - RG n° 08/08218 APPELANT Monsieur [U] [B] [J] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représenté par Me HANINE

Sobczak, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and to declare the remainder of the application inadmissible; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

    However, the court could not endorse the defendants’ conduct, having regard, firstly, to the titles of the articles.

regard to the above application lodged on 2 May 2012, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having regard to

    Having explained that the Governments in the 1920s and 1930s had attempted to create a homogeneous and monocultural nation, the report stated that, having regard to the presence in the country

regard to the above application lodged on 23 October 2007, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated

Having regard “to the legislation in force” and “considering that the contents of the books might be in contravention of section 7(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act” it refused the applicant's request