CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0228DEC002291620
28 février 2023
The applicant was not subjected to any restriction as regards his visiting rights hence his visitors and lawyer were able to visit him within the same period.
Page 8 sur 174
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3410
9 mars 2006
Hence, it could not qualify as an effective investigation.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10052
27 août 1991
Applicant unable to take direct independent action to seek payment from his clients (even to the T.E.E. in the first instance) of his fees – hence impairment of very essence of his "right to a court".
ECLI:CEDH:002-4282
20 juillet 2004
Although the applicant’s claim was reduced by the debt adjustment, the court found that such a reduction was possible under the 1993 Act, and hence, that the payment schedule could not be postponed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3938
22 mars 2005
In May 2001, the authorities announced that the applicant’s husband had presumably been murdered by two drug-users, hence the crime was not politically motivated.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2979
12 décembre 2006
Hence, the Italian and subsequently the French authorities had been entitled to conclude that the applicant had unequivocally waived his right to appear and be tried in person.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2589
26 juillet 2007
Hence the fact that the Evangelical Christian religion was being practised by a minority of the local residents could not justify an interference with the rights of followers of that religion.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3596
10 novembre 2005
Hence, the dispute concerning the applicant’s discharge from office fell outside the scope of Article 6(1): incompatible ratione materiae .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC003481707
13 décembre 2016
The term “applicant” will, hence, be used while referring to Ms Ljiljana Šćepanović. The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196063
27 août 2019
That procedure was envisaged under Article 114 of the CCP, hence, the statements obtained as a result of that questioning coupled with other circumstantial evidence, was sufficient to prove the applicant
ECLI:CEDH:002-4478
18 mars 2004
Hence, the applicant party’s list was registered by the CEC. The Supreme Court judgments were subsequently quashed in supervisory review proceedings and registration of the list was annulled.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3584
13 décembre 2005
Hence, the Czech Republic did not have any general obligation to restore the property confiscated under the Presidential Decrees to the owners.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5336
13 juin 2002
Hence he was prevented from challenging the confiscation of his passport in the course of legal proceedings whereby the authorities would have established the relevant facts and given the reasons for this
ECLI:CEDH:002-7709
10 septembre 2013
Hence, having regard to the margin of appreciation left to the State, the domestic authorities’ refusal to transmit the e‑mail message in question to the applicant could not be regarded as unjustified.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216726
9 mars 2022
Hence, the exception under Article 13 (b) was to be applied and the child was not to be returned to Germany. The applicant relies on Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-109482
20 février 2012
TAREKE and Others against Turkey lodged on 18 March 2011 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Henok Tareke, Ms Salmon Tahaste, Mr Jamal Ali El Amen and Mr Germay Gebremariam Tela are
ECLI:CEDH:001-116127
13 décembre 2012
Hence, it is important to know the names of those precursors who have implemented the ideals of a ‘transparent municipality”. It is wonderful to know that all goes well here.”
ECLI:CEDH:002-2239
14 février 2008
Hence, she returned to the cemetery with a priest and laid some stones and flowers there.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3799
16 juin 2005
Hence, the Court concluded that the applicant had been deprived of her liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113597
12 septembre 2012
Hence, the District Court decided that the applicant should remain in custody. The applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal which, on 20 July 2010, rejected the appeal.