Consequently, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1.

While the applicant held the position of head of administration for all kindergartens in Slavonski Brod, Z.B. sought and obtained employment in one of the kindergartens in Slavonski Brod as a teacher.

Moreover, the other circumstances in which the hearing was held were hardly designed to encourage public attendance: it was held early in the morning in a room which, although not too small to accommodate

She had held an interview with the second applicant, who denied these allegations and was very pleasant in communication with the Head Nurse during the interview.

The letter bore seventeen signatures, including those by the head of Dalnerechensk municipal council and his first deputy, the deputy head of the town police, the deputy head of the local department of

On 1 October 2004 the Justice of the Peace held a hearing in the claimant’s presence. The applicant was not present.

  The applicant was held in detention facility no. IZ-47/1 until 16 February 2003.

  The Court held unanimously: that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights; that there was no need to examine the complaint under

  In August 2000 a meeting was held with the applicant’s battalion, at which the commanders told the soldiers they had not fought well.

They requested payment of an aggregate sum of 43,624,700 Italian lire comprising the tax due and penalties.

made with a help of a computer on the basis of an impress of the authentic seal. 8.

In particular, it held that no written contract had been concluded with the applicant and that the post of head physician did not exist in the hospital’s staff schedule. 15.

Subsequently, on 21 December 1994 the court held a hearing. 21.

It therefore held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 14.

It held, unanimously, that there had been no violation in Gülşen and Halil Yasin Ketenoğlu v. Turkey under this head .

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant   100,000 Austrian schillings for non-pecuniary damage.

The applicant was too scared to call the police but she texted the district inspector and asked for help.

   By letter dated 8 May 1987, the Head Master wrote to ILEA, enclosing reports concerning Paget-Lewis, stating that while he believed Paget-Lewis needed medical help, his continued presence

It was declared admissible on 4 May 1999 and a public hearing was held on 12 October 1999.