Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002384294
17 janvier 1996
17 janvier 1996
The alleged vendors of the hashish, S and R-T, pleaded not guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC004076898
25 mai 1999
25 mai 1999
Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.”
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244036
2 juin 2025
2 juin 2025
However, she could only be found guilty of money laundering in respect of the period of 4 January 1999 onwards (date when the crime of money laundering was introduced into the CC), and the consummation
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC002140017
17 octobre 2017
17 octobre 2017
According to the judge, only a part of the assets had had its origin in the offences of which the applicant had been found guilty in Italy.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0724DEC000427469
24 juillet 1970
24 juillet 1970
April 1971, the applicant was found guilty of two disciplinary offenses, namely of having failed to observe the official routine (Nichteinhaltung des Dienstweges) when complaining against his superior
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003740197
1 juillet 1998
1 juillet 1998
innocence instead of the prosecution proving guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC000656904
10 mai 2005
10 mai 2005
Before the Court of First Instance, the accused was found guilty, after he had filed a guilty plea, of offences regarding drug trafficking and other related offences, and was condemned to sixteen years
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC005489216
25 juin 2019
25 juin 2019
Decisions taken in this context could not be regarded as requiring a prior determination of guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC000424802
8 juillet 2004
8 juillet 2004
Pursuant to Article 35 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: “A decision on the issue of guilt in disfavour of the person charged requires five votes in the High Court. ...
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3859
10 mai 2005
10 mai 2005
The Civil Court held that the declarations at the press conference could not be considered as statements of guilt; declared that the applicants’ fundamental rights had not been breached; and directed the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC002805508
21 février 2012
21 février 2012
Whenever an indication of sentence was sought, the defendant’s representative had to advise the defendant that he should change his plea to guilty only if he accepted that he was guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228813
9 octobre 2023
9 octobre 2023
formal finding of guilt, in violation of their right to be presumed innocent guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC003496497
11 septembre 2001
11 septembre 2001
According to Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, a person who is charged with a criminal offence shall be deemed innocent until proven guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5074
18 décembre 2002
18 décembre 2002
The applicant lodged a request for release with the District Court, submitting that there was no substantial evidence of guilt, as required by Article 273 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2655
28 juin 2007
28 juin 2007
In 2002 the applicant was found guilty of premeditated murder of a fellow serviceman and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245403
16 septembre 2025
16 septembre 2025
lodged on 22 November 2018 communicated on 16 September 2025 STATEMENT OF FACTS The application concerns the applicant’s administrative conviction for leaving the scene of a traffic accident before his guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115432
20 novembre 2012
20 novembre 2012
On 13 June 2007 the Myasnikovskiy District Court of the Rostov Region dismissed the applicant’s line of defence and found him guilty of A.’s murder.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11184
30 août 2016
30 août 2016
199 August-September 2016 Igor Pascari v. the Republic of Moldova - 25555/10 Judgment 30.8.2016 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Criminal charge Fair hearing Bus driver found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245592
24 septembre 2025
24 septembre 2025
ZADEH against the Czech Republic lodged on 20 January 2023 communicated on 24 September 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1726
29 janvier 2009
29 janvier 2009
On 15 July 2002 the district court found Mr Ch. guilty of assault, sentenced him to six months correctional labour suspended on probation and awarded the applicant damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary
Source officiellePage 8 sur 692