CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

152 résultats pour « Elsie DALMAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626JUD002595906

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2007

26 juin 2007

  11–12, §   27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, pp. 87-88, §   38).

Source officielle

Page 8 sur 8

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC002702303

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2007

16 octobre 2007

  11-12, § 27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19   February   1998, Reports 1998-I, pp.   87-88, §   38).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD005680318

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2021

12 janvier 2021

xa0; 8 § 1, be in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society, that is to say, justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued ( Dalia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC005788500

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2005

19 mai 2005

Certain witnesses, however, provided detailed statements as to how the events unfolded, what their own role was and who else was involved.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC001180912

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

    Section 12 obliges municipalities to provide successful claimants with substitute accommodation by 31 December 2016, or else they must pay the flat owners the difference between the free

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0301JUD005658100

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2006

1 mars 2006

    The Court observes that the Government's objection that domestic remedies have not been exhausted is based on two elements, namely the applicant's failure to use the remedies provided for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD005034607

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2016

31 mars 2016

    Where the Government claims non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, it bears the burden of proving that the applicant has not used a remedy that was both effective and available (see Dalia v

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0927JUD001833919

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2022

27 septembre 2022

Invoking Article 8 of the Convention, he made representations to the Home Office as to why he should not be deported on conclusion of the custodial element of his sentence. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD004355310

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

  In the context of deprivation of liberty the Court has consistently stressed that, to fall under Article 3, the suffering and humiliation involved must in any event go beyond that inevitable element

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC005627100

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2004

8 janvier 2004

Article 292 CCP provides inter alia that a detention order must contain an explanation of the actual grounds for the precautionary measure and of the specific evidence of guilt, including the factual elements

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1980:1106JUD000736776

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 1980

6 novembre 1980

did not permit any curtailment of legal interests which it protected, conferred and made mandatory (non consent[iva] veruno affievolimento di situazioni giuridiche tutelate, volute e pretese proprio dalla

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD003943805

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

He claimed that there were new elements which could prove the guilt of the National Railway Company in respect of the events which had led to his accident.

Source officielle