The present application also relates to the applicant's civil action for damages.

that notwithstanding the hybrid nature of the taking, the non-pecuniary damage in the circumstances of the present case falls to be assessed according to the constant jurisprudence for lawful expropriations

Following the continuation of the landslide, in 2005 the applicant’s building suffered damage to its structure, and in 2008 that damage worsened.

Consequently, any other remedy available to the applicant, including a claim for damages, had limited chances of success.

The defendants had acted unlawfully and intentionally and therefore the claim for damages had been justified.

On 12 August 2008 the local residents, alleging nuisance caused by the wind turbines (a constant buzz and glare), brought the applicant to the court of Torres Vedras.

    By a writ issued on 20 August 1986 against the Chief Constable of the RUC, the applicant instituted a civil action for damages before the High Court in Northern Ireland in respect of, inter

The subsistence wage was not an appropriate benchmark for assessing the amount of non-pecuniary damage.

Accordingly, it requested MDL 294,405.37 in respect of pecuniary damage, EUR 5,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR   900 in respect of costs and expenses. 26.

    Damage 24.

    Damage 47.     The applicants claimed 5,000 euros (EUR) each in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 48.

if such damage occurred. 39 .

    Damage 45.     The applicants claimed non-pecuniary damage for the suffering and distress caused by the violations of Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention.

On 28 December 1985 Detective Constable S. arrested the applicant under section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1984 which empowered a police constable to arrest, without

The prosecutor’s request to freeze her assets had been wrongful and had directly caused her that damage.

He requested the court to declare the administration’s actions unlawful and to award him non-pecuniary damages.

Considérant ce qui suit : 1 Le 13 janvier 2023, à Dammarie-les-Lys (Seine-et-Marne), M A B a été contrôlé au volant de son véhicule et a fait l'objet d'un test salivaire qui a révélé la présence de "

regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on l5 March l985 by Mrs Maria Constança

Moreover, as regards the extent of the damage suffered by L., the District Court based itself exclusively on A.’s testimony.