CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD002592102
1 juin 2006
The Court’s case-law establishes that there must be a clear causal link between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention (amongst other authorities, Barberà
Page 8 sur 11
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD006685012
17 mai 2016
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; 3.
2ème Chambre
DTA_2204486_20250804
4 août 2025
P L, Mme C AF, représentés par Me Barbaro, demandent au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la délibération du 24 janvier 2019 par laquelle le conseil municipal de Contes a approuvé le plan local d'urbanisme de
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC004660199
11 décembre 2001
Thus, the request to hold an oral hearing is rejected as unfounded.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC005884209
6 octobre 2015
Chamber composed of: András Sajó, President, Khanlar Hajiyev, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Erik Møse, Dmitry Dedov, judges, Barbara
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0310DEC001174585
10 mars 1989
Barbara Eggleston, Christian CND organiser, are recorded as communist sympathisers; ii) the second applicant is recorded
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1217JUD004338219
17 décembre 2024
that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of the absence of sufficient grounds for ordering and keeping the applicants in pre-trial detention; Holds that there is no
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD000611205
4 décembre 2012
Holds by six votes to one that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention; 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD005516711
24 juillet 2012
22774/93, § 44, ECHR 1999 ‑ V; Barbara Wiśniewska v. Poland , no. 9072/02, § 93, 29 November 2011). 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0210JUD005376000
10 février 2004
Holds unanimously that there has been a violation of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention; 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0729JUD004229798
29 juillet 2004
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0126DEC003817897
26 janvier 1999
Court HR, Barbera and others v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no 146).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002593594
28 février 1996
In such circumstances additional importance would therefore attach to ensuring that the impartiality of the jury is, "by other means", objectively guaranteed (No. 14191/88, Holm v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD003074203
6 octobre 2009
This may, if appropriate, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, inter alia , Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0223JUD001675790
23 février 1994
Italy judgment of 12 February 1985, Series A no. 89, p. 14, para. 27, and the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, p. 33, para. 78). 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0906DEC001532989
6 septembre 1991
Court H.R., Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A No. 146, p. 31, para. 68).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1005JUD002162313
5 octobre 2021
In appropriate cases, this may include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0422JUD001235186
22 avril 1992
As principal submission To hold that each and every charge brought against the defendant Vidal is not established, to find him not guilty and acquit him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001106984
19 mars 1991
Counsel for the applicant asked the Court to hold that there had been a violation of paragraphs 1 and 3 (d) taken together. AS TO THE LAW THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD000084705
27 mai 2010
Holds that there has been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as regards the length of the proceedings; 4.