The applicant reiterated that the first-instance court had lacked the requisite impartiality because Judge A.L., the defendant in the impugned proceedings, had been a judge of that court.

DELCROIX, Me François HOURCADE, la SCP MONEGER ASSIER BELAUD, la SELARL TORTIGUE PETIT SORNIQUE RIBETON, avocats, en leurs conclusions et plaidoiries, a mis l’affaire en délibéré au 18 Mai 2026.

The judgment of 17 July 2006 was not subject to cassation appeal and became final.

In the case of Alexander v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Nona Tsotsoria, President,   Paul Mahoney,   Faris

(P.D.G) - Assisté de Me Bela'd MAZNI, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : D 1654 INTIMÉE [****************] Composition de la cour : En application des dispositions de l'article 945-1 du nouveau code

He claimed that his son had been killed because A.S. and other soldiers had been sent on a mission without weapons.

l'affaire a été débattue le 07 Décembre 2022, en audience publique, les avocats ne s'y étant pas opposés, devant Monsieur Patrice BOURQUIN, Président de Chambre chargé du rapport et Monsieur Olivier BEAUDIER

The head of the department who was responsible for overseeing the compliance with the procedure could not be disciplined because he had retired in 2006.

Subsequently, when the applicant referred to himself as I.’s father, the child became confused.

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Linos-Alexandre

Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué que, de 1978 à 1982, des lettres de change ont été tirées, sous le couvert de marchés de travaux fictifs, par la société Entreprise antillaise des travaux de t

; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 22 April 2015   THIRD SECTION Application no. 7753/13 Alexandru

        In January 1982, the applicant bought a house in a new sub-division of Rotterdam, in the sub-municipality (deelgemeente) Prins Alexander, which house was built in

    After Croatia declared independence in 1991, all the YPA’s property became State property. 8.

    The applicants complained that their removal to Italy would be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention because of the deficiencies in the reception system for asylum-seekers.

He further alleged lack of impartiality and a violation of the principle of equality of arms, because his appeal before the Supreme Court had concerned a decision of the Appeal Commission, a State body

  18316/15 ( Alexandru Emilian Iancu v.

The judgment became final on 2 January 2008. 11.

    They contended further that the application was manifestly ill ‑ founded because the applicant had pleaded guilty. 23.