D.M.’s pre-trial statements 10 .

}     Communicated on 22 September 2014   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 51987/08 James Stevens McHUGH against the United Kingdom and 1,014 other applications lodged on 7 June 2010 STATEMENT

The interviewer did not have the police reports in their full and final state, nonetheless they did contain sufficient information to acquaint him with what happened in January and February.

Anyone not aware of the applicant’s illness would have reasonably understood to what illness L.D. had referred.

It was thus unacceptable for the State to now claim that the applicant had been positively discriminated in comparison to persons of reduced capacity to work.

    The ISS’s first official record of V.K.’s statement reporting the applicant was dated 15 January 2000.

of witness M.S. ... which he confirmed during the confrontation with [the applicant] ... ... the pre-trial statement of witness D.T. ... ... the pre-trial statement of witness D.O ...

  Vran, State Attorney. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Such a request is not necessary where an interim measure concerns proceedings which courts can start of their own motion. 45.

As to the risk of the applicant obstructing the investigation, the prosecution claimed, with reference to the statement of G.K.

    Before the visit by OSCE officials on 18 June 2010, the first applicant was “instructed” for thirteen hours on what to say and what not to say, under threat of severe ill-treatment. 36.

[The applicants] claim that the statements are true and refer to the principle that they cannot be held liable for true statements.

case and “may” include an award of damages against the State ( Healy v.

In the first incident, K.E. had briefly shown his penis to her at home while her mother had been in the next room.

was of no relevance to the assessment of the reliability of his statements.

However, while awaiting methadone treatment she had been prescribed the drug Dolcontin.

An open wound on the left part of his head was recorded, while his left eye was found to be bluish-red. The applicant complained of pain in his legs. 25.

State politicians against him.

The risk of any mistake made by the State authority must be borne by the State itself and the errors must not be remedied at the expense of the individuals concerned (see, among other authorities, mutatis