CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 269 résultats pour « Forgeron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD003223804

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2012

6 novembre 2012

    The judge referred the matter to the prosecution authorities, which opened an investigation against the applicant on charges of forgery.

Source officielle

Page 79 sur 114

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122325

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2013

10 juin 2013

Moreover, two additional arrest warrants were pending against him in Germany, one relating to a further offence of drug trafficking and the other, dated 1 July 2004, concerning forgery of identification

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC001861391

Admin. suprême

30 juin 1993

30 juin 1993

        By summons of 5 October 1989 the applicant and the five other co- accused, including the judge, were charged with fraud, forgery and use of forged documents and summoned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0119DEC002566494

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 1995

19 janvier 1995

Moreover, the wording of the letter of 23 April 1993 from the Zairese embassy in Paris indicated that it was not an official document but a forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022DEC001841520

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2024

22 octobre 2024

Pirotu   – “the High Court”) convicted the applicant of abuse of position, a criminal offence under Article 234 of the Serbian Criminal Code (see paragraph 20 below) and, together with N.M., of forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615JUD002197908

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2017

15 juin 2017

On 9 June 2008 the first-instance court convicted the applicant of large-scale smuggling of oil products, aggravated forgery and money laundering in an organised group and sentenced him to imprisonment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC003051996

Admin. suprême

16 avril 1998

16 avril 1998

        In the meantime, in 1986, the applicant had requested the police to investigate the alleged forgery again, but that was rejected by the police as the case had already

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1472302-1544866

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

  In January 1994 the applicant was arrested and charged with forgery. He was released after 48 hours.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0304JUD002824504

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2010

4 mars 2010

    On an unspecified date criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant on charges of abuse of powers by a public official, aggravated bribery and forgery. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0524JUD007453610

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2022

24 mai 2022

    By a bill of indictment dated 13 July 1999, the applicants were committed to stand trial before the Istanbul Assize Court for forgery of official documents and aggravated fraud (Articles

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD004241116

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2021

10 juin 2021

    On 29 July 2013 the first applicant was indicted in the Zagreb Municipal Criminal Court ( Općinski kazneni sud u Zagrebu ) on charges of forgery of an official document. 6.

Source officielle
CAA

4ème chambre (formation à 3)

DCA_24BX02234_20250926

Admin. Appel

26 septembre 2025

26 septembre 2025

Leprédelaborderie, la SCEA De Pouillac, l’EARL Douhaud, l’EARL Du Robinet, l’EARL Le Champ Mure, l’EARL Medeau, l’entreprise individuelle (EI) Frédéric Michaud, l’entreprise à responsabilité limitée (EARL) Du Fougeroux

Source officielle
CAA

4ème chambre (formation à 3)

DCA_24BX02277_20250926

Admin. Appel

26 septembre 2025

26 septembre 2025

Leprédelaborderie, la SCEA De Pouillac, l’EARL Douhaud, l’EARL Du Robinet, l’EARL Le Champ Mure, l’EARL Medeau, l’entreprise individuelle (EI) Frédéric Michaud, l’entreprise à responsabilité limitée (EARL) Du Fougeroux

Source officielle
CC

cr

61372624cd5801467742340e

Cassation

2 octobre 2002

2 octobre 2002

la structure de l'offre de l'entreprise Mas est identique, à la décimale près, sur quatre postes, à celle des entreprises Saes, Sogea et EI-Gcc ; que la structure de l'offre du groupement Rosina-Fougerolle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD005075613

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2016

26 avril 2016

investigation, on 1 February 2010, the District Court of Paphos issued an arrest warrant on the ground that there was reasonable suspicion based on evidence that the applicant had been involved in forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD002671805

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

The court acknowledged that the security investigation conducted into the applicant and his family had revealed that his father had previously been convicted of forgery.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2895518-3189426

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

He was arrested on suspicion of obtaining property by deception and sentenced to four years and eight months in prison in 2000 for forgery and perverting the course of justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1014DEC004185298

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 1999

14 octobre 1999

The applicant was accused of belonging to a Mafia type association, drug-trafficking, unlawful possession of arms and forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0513DEC001156985

Admin. suprême

13 mai 1986

13 mai 1986

  The applicant claims that DEV-Genc is the forerunner of the student movement in Turkey.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203209

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2020

29 mai 2020

On 13 July 2011 the applicant lodged a criminal complaint with the Sopron Police Department alleging that Cs.H.’s declaration of paternity of 3   June 2011 (see paragraph 13 above) constituted forgery

Source officielle