CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD004810517
9 juillet 2019
In mid-February the Federal Drug Control Service was informed that the applicant had plans to sell amphetamines on 17 February 2016. 6.
Page 79 sur 2955
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012JUD006086516
12 octobre 2023
On 28 February 2015 a forensic medical expert examined the applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930DEC003598602
30 septembre 2004
On 6 February 2001 the hearing was again adjourned due to the absence of the respondent's representative. A new hearing was scheduled for 23 February 2001.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD001270302
3 juillet 2008
Petersburg OMON had taken his son on 5 February 2000, there were no results. 60.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216411
23 février 2022
avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Published on 14 March 2022 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 10761/16 Mher YENOKYAN against Armenia lodged on 22 February
ECLI:CEDH:001-146459
28 août 2014
In the period between September 2012 and February 2013 (Appendix 2, column no. 5) the Supreme Court of Kabardino-Balkaria quashed the Town Court’s refusals (Appendix 2, column no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD005892514
21 janvier 2021
After their arrest, at around 3 a.m. on 20 February 2014 the applicants and a number of other individuals who had been arrested during the dispersal on 19 February 2014 were brought
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC000341805
6 octobre 2005
On 18 February 2005, the scheduled hearing on the applicant’s appeal and request for an interim measure was cancelled as the impugned decision of 2 February 2005 had been withdrawn in the meantime.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126702
2 septembre 2013
On 22 February 2011 the applicant was detained with a view to preparing her removal.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0305DEC003674109
5 mars 2020
Russia 26/09/2012 Sergey Vladimirovich TIKHONOVSKIY 21/02/1961 Voronezh Russian Failure to reply to the Court’s correspondence since February 2019, including a strike-out warning sent on 14 June
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0929DEC002885513
29 septembre 2015
She obtained final judgments ordering the debtor to pay her certain sums (see the Vladičin Han Municipal Court’s judgments of 7 October 2003, 26 February 2004 and 17 February 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007DEC005959108
7 octobre 2010
On 6 February 2009 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation upheld the extension order of 6 November 2008.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146623
1 septembre 2014
On 7 February 2011 the President of the Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint as unfounded.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126946
11 septembre 2013
By an order of the Head of the Committee of 27 February 2009 the applicant was dismissed from his job.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55878
18 février 1998
1997 IN THE CASE OF FINDLAY AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 February 1998 at the 618th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The
ECLI:CEDH:001-138907
8 novembre 2013
On 27 February 2007 the District Court, after fresh examination, extended the applicant’s detention from 17 January until 28 February 2007 on the same grounds as before.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0223JUD003959898
23 février 2006
On 10 February 1997 the President of the District Court fixed the dates of the hearings for 25 and 27 February 1997.
ordo
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:OR90445
16 avril 2026
[Q] Défendeur : la société Ferrari Expéditions France Requête n° : 1182/25 Ordonnance n° : 90445 du 16 avril 2026 ORDONNANCE _______________ ENTRE : la société Ferrari Expéditions
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001344087
19 février 1991
Enrico Ferraro habite Rome.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001517589
7 août 1996
On 21 January 1994 the Commission referred the case to the Court, which gave judgment on 10 February 1995.