Moreover, the international wanted notice had not been issued until 2015 and there was no explanation in the file for this delay.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the delay in the domestic proceedings. She, furthermore, complained about the violation of her property rights.

No other inordinate delay occurred in the proceedings. 7.

It further observed that the courts had taken necessary disciplinary measures to avoid delays, and some of the delays (including the staying of the proceedings on two occasions) had been caused by the

The Court found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of that enforcement delay (see Aleksentseva and Others v.

Le rapport de Mme Dely a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M. B...

The Supreme Court declared the applicant’s appeal on points of law inadmissible on 8   August 2022 (allegedly served on the applicant with delay).

judgment in the applicant’s favour and had withdrawn his parental authority because he had failed to get involved in his child’s life in the seven years since the divorce and registered a three-month delay

dont le siège social est [Adresse 2] – RCS de [Localité 4] n° B 572 084 697 Partie défenderesse : assistée du Cabinet RAVAYROL-GIROUDET, Me Philippe RAVAYROL, Avocat (L155) et comparant par Me Nicole DELAY-PEUCH

TRIBUNAL DES ACTIVITES ECONOMIQUES DE NANTERRE JUGEMENT PRONONCE PAR MISE A DISPOSITION AU GREFFE [G] 13 mai 2026 6ème CHAMBRE DEMANDEUR SAS PROFOG [Adresse 1] comparant par Me Nicole DELAY [Adresse

Etienne Huré, et Mme Corinne Delaye juges, assistés de Mme Margaux Lebrun, greffier.

Par deux mémoires en défense enregistrés le 15 avril 2022 et le 13 septembre 2022, la commune de Vienne représentée par Me Delay, conclut au rejet de la requête et, en outre, à ce que les requérants lui

E et Mme F B, les premiers dénommés ayant la qualité de représentant unique, représentés par Me Delay, demandent au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 7 juin 2021 par lequel le maire de La Tour-de-Salvagny

The applicant complains, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No. 1, that due to the delay and errors of the domestic courts in the enforcement proceedings instituted

Committee of Ministers decided that there had been a breach of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1), due to the administration's delay

Although the applicant was responsible for delays in the proceedings, those delays, which occurred following his release, had no influence on the total period during which he was deprived of his liberty

just satisfaction, within three months, 700 000 drachmas in respect of non-pecuniary damage and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated on the basis of each full elapsed month of delay

French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 40 000 French francs and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated on the basis of each full elapsed month of delay