CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13090
16 décembre 2020
Only if both component elements of the alleged “administrative practice” were sufficiently substantiated by prima facie evidence did the exhaustion rule not apply.
Page 79 sur 1534
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123DEC000760419
23 novembre 2021
Both of these instruments contained “non-prosecution” provisions which were subsequently reflected in a number of judgments of the Court of Appeal.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12080
13 septembre 2018
It considered both the generic compliance of the relevant interception regime as well as the specific question whether the individual applicant’s rights had, in fact, been breached.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD004413118
27 juin 2024
p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 1.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1394308-1455831
6 juillet 2005
Mr Angelov and Mr Petkov were both conscripts in a division of the army dealing with the construction of apartment blocks and other civilian projects.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-119132
2 avril 2013
The experts also established that, although both parents were responsible for that situation, the first applicant, whose behaviour they qualified as “emotional abuse”, was more responsible for it.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-740703-752637
29 avril 2003
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously in both cases that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in both those respects.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC000166619
15 septembre 2020
Following the appeal of both parties, on 19 February 2015 the Sofia City Court approved a settlement reached in the meantime by the parties as regards custody and contact rights.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3127335-3487877
20 mai 2010
(Both applicants) Violation of Article 5 §§ 4 and 5 Just satisfaction: EUR 6,000, each (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 1,000, each (costs and expenses) Baran and Hun v.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5992
13 juillet 2000
Subsequently, following the Youth Court’s decision of 22 December 1998 to allow contact with both children, the first applicant was allowed to visit them for the first time on 29 April 1999.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110JUD003950908
10 novembre 2009
Both cases passed through each level twice. A. Admissibility 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC007325001
9 septembre 2008
& Co. , p. 144, and Matthews , § 32, both cited above).
ECLI:CEDH:001-122316
11 juin 2013
As of 21 December 2010, a new Article127a provides that the questions related to a minor’s travel abroad and to the issuing of identity papers, are to be decided jointly by both parents.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD000953610
15 novembre 2016
The prosecutor was present at the appeal hearing unlike both the applicant and his counsel. 9.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2617072-2869111
11 février 2009
In both cases the applicants occupy dwelling houses built on parcels of land falling within the category of maritime public land that they are no longer authorised to occupy and have been ordered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC007216401
5 janvier 2006
She sued both her former employer (the ambulance station) and the company responsible for the chemical accident. She sought a civil law pension, damages and just satisfaction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312JUD003855097
12 mars 2002
xa0; The applicant complained that British social security and tax legislation discriminated against him on grounds of sex, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with both
ECLI:CEDH:002-2237
12 février 2008
However, his application and subsequent appeal were both dismissed.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-105614
8 juin 2011
the licensing tender in the courts of the Republic of Armenia ; Having taken note of the authorities’ commitment that the NTRC will fully and properly substantiate and reason its decisions, “both
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC001185810
11 décembre 2012
However, the Court has also found that this does not necessarily imply a duty under the Convention to allow the alleged biological father to challenge the legal father’s status (see Ahrens and Kautzor , both