CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13090

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2020

16 décembre 2020

Only if both component elements of the alleged “administrative practice” were sufficiently substantiated by prima facie evidence did the exhaustion rule not apply.

Source officielle

Page 79 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123DEC000760419

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

Both of these instruments contained “non-prosecution” provisions which were subsequently reflected in a number of judgments of the Court of Appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12080

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

It considered both the generic compliance of the relevant interception regime as well as the specific question whether the individual applicant’s rights had, in fact, been breached.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD004413118

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2024

27 juin 2024

p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 1.30   a.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1394308-1455831

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2005

6 juillet 2005

  Mr Angelov and Mr Petkov were both conscripts in a division of the army dealing with the construction of apartment blocks and other civilian projects.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-119132

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2013

2 avril 2013

The experts also established that, although both parents were responsible for that situation, the first applicant, whose behaviour they qualified as “emotional abuse”, was more responsible for it.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-740703-752637

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2003

29 avril 2003

Accordingly, the Court held unanimously in both cases that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in both those respects.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC000166619

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2020

15 septembre 2020

    Following the appeal of both parties, on 19 February 2015 the Sofia City Court approved a settlement reached in the meantime by the parties as regards custody and contact rights.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3127335-3487877

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

(Both applicants) Violation of Article 5 §§ 4 and 5 Just satisfaction: EUR 6,000, each (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 1,000, each (costs and expenses)   Baran and Hun v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5992

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2000

13 juillet 2000

Subsequently, following the Youth Court’s decision of 22 December 1998 to allow contact with both children, the first applicant was allowed to visit them for the first time on 29 April 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110JUD003950908

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2009

10 novembre 2009

Both cases passed through each level twice. A.     Admissibility 36.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC007325001

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2008

9 septembre 2008

& Co. , p. 144, and Matthews , § 32, both cited above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122316

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2013

11 juin 2013

As of 21 December 2010, a new Article127a provides that the questions related to a minor’s travel abroad and to the issuing of identity papers, are to be decided jointly by both parents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD000953610

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2016

15 novembre 2016

The prosecutor was present at the appeal hearing unlike both the applicant and his counsel. 9.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2617072-2869111

Admin. suprême

11 février 2009

11 février 2009

  In both cases the applicants occupy dwelling houses built on parcels of land falling within the category of maritime public land that they are no longer authorised to occupy and have been ordered

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC007216401

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2006

5 janvier 2006

She sued both her former employer (the ambulance station) and the company responsible for the chemical accident. She sought a civil law pension, damages and just satisfaction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312JUD003855097

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2002

12 mars 2002

xa0; The applicant complained that British social security and tax legislation discriminated against him on grounds of sex, in breach of Article   14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2237

Admin. suprême

12 février 2008

12 février 2008

However, his application and subsequent appeal were both dismissed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-105614

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2011

8 juin 2011

the licensing tender in the courts of the Republic of Armenia ;   Having taken note of the authorities’ commitment that the NTRC will fully and properly substantiate and reason its decisions, “both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC001185810

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2012

11 décembre 2012

However, the Court has also found that this does not necessarily imply a duty under the Convention to allow the alleged biological father to challenge the legal father’s status (see Ahrens and Kautzor , both

Source officielle