courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 6 octobre 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le maire du Pouliguen à sa demande de copie de documents relatifs au dossier « Confortement et réhaussement des berges

Par une requête enregistrée le 28 mars 2022, M. et Mme A B et C, représentés par Me Piettre, demandent au tribunal : - d'annuler l'arrêté du 1er octobre 2021 par lequel le maire de la commune de Bernex

suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 28 mars 2022, Mme B A, représentée par Me Piettre, demande au tribunal : - d'annuler l'arrêté du 1er octobre 2021 par lequel le maire de la commune de Bernex

X... demande au Conseil d'Etat l'annulation pour excès de pouvoir de la décision du 19 mai 1999 par laquelle l'ambassadeur de France à Berne a refusé de lui délivrer un visa de court séjour en France ;

very high, they had been paid insufficient interest on additional compensation received following the expropriation of their land and the authorities had delayed in paying them the relevant amount.

The Court finds that domestic remedies have not been exhausted as required by Article   35   §   1 of the Convention.

He further claims that no such act has ever been officially issued. B.

On 9 June 1997 the court notified the applicant’s lawyer in writing that the court charges have not been paid.

du Tarn, couronné par la route de , qui correspond au sol de son niveau R + 1, situé à 2,60 mètres au-dessus de la berge du Tarn.

been inflicted upon nor provide any medical evidence in support of his allegation.

On 9 June 1998 the trial was adjourned because a new judge rapporteur had in the meantime been appointed and had to study the case-file.

MEUBLES DU BEARN prise en la personne de son représentant légal c / Monsieur Serge X...

Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights and that there had been no violation

The court also noted that the applicant had been diagnosed as suffering from addiction to drugs and that it had been considered in previous reports that he had been in need of medical treatment.

They had all been recognised as political refugees in Germany.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

they had not been allowed to return to their village.

They claimed that there had been no interference in the applicants’ private or family life.

submitted to the case file and which had been commented on by the applicant.