The applicant asked them what the purpose of their request was but they did not answer.

    On 12 September 1997 S.D. made a statement. 22.

Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWHC Admin 670) found that the Secretary of State had such a power to detain under the Immigration Act 1971 (see paragraph 19 below).

On 2   August 2001 he was referred to the Cizre State Hospital, where he was diagnosed with a corneal ulcer. 8.

He was not an employee and it had been planned that he would start as an employee of company O. only in April 2006.

The applicant encountered other detainees during her daily walks, while attending cooking classes, and during weekly showers and visits to the laundry room. 11.

Thus, they had not exhausted domestic remedies on that point and they could still today start new constitutional redress proceedings claiming compensation.

  Article 9 of this Act contains income limits below which a litigant can be assigned a lawyer, whose fees are to be paid by the State.

The train in question belonged to South Caucasus Railways, a Soviet State entity. 4.

The suspicion was supported by evidence from witnesses and statements by the other accused.

M.M. had run away after that and had no knowledge what had happened to the applicants’ father.

  37508/16, Mr   Ghica, had died on 16 February 2019, while in detention.

is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

On 3 May 2017, on the basis of the evidence in the file (notably, several witness statements), the prosecutor’s office decided to end the investigation.

Officer: - What is your last name? What is your first and patronymic name? The detainee: - Born on 27 August 1975. Another officer: - Alexander Andreyevich, we need to get the convoy group ready.

    The applicant’s state of health before imprisonment 4.

  132 to 135 Strait Street, Valletta (hereinafter jointly referred to as “the property”).

    Punishment is a measure of State coercion attributed by a court sentence.

Thus, as the Court held in its judgment in Varnava and Others , cited above, in disappearance cases where there is a state of ignorance and uncertainty and, by definition, a failure to account for what