The applicant's son did not heed his call.

The Agency sought recovery of the sum of GBP 70,250 allegedly paid to his solicitor in 2001 for buying a house and the sum of GBP 5,969.10 held in a bank account, alleging that these were the proceeds

M.B. acknowledged the civil claim in part, but stated that the sum of LTL 15,000 was too high.

The position he held was such that he could influence other judges of that court. 18.

that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention with respect to the first applicant; - held that there had been no violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, with respect to the

that there had been a violation of Article 11 of the Convention; -   held that it was unnecessary to rule on the complaints under Article   6, paragraph   1, and Articles   9, 10 &

by eight votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), inasmuch as those proceedings were not adversarial;        - held by eight votes to

    For most of the period the applicant was held in cell no.   106 measuring around 50 square metres.

    The Court reiterates that in its admissibility decision of 20   November 2003 it held that in awarding the sum of EUR   1,000 in compensation for non-pecuniary damage under the

of tribunal de grande instance that had been caused by town council’s refusal to comply with that judgment – sum awarded on equitable basis.

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded 3,000   euros (EUR) to each applicant for non-pecuniary damage, or a total sum of EUR 945,000.

Her only source of income comes from servicing vacation houses in Sinemorets during the late spring and summer. 7 .

  In its Chamber judgment of 4 October 2007 in that case, the Court held, by five votes to two, that there had been a violation of Article 10.

  The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that the overall duration of the proceedings, more than five years and eight months, had not been reasonable and therefore held that there had

on 21 September 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

on 19 October 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 19 October 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 19 October 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 19 October 1994, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the