CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1125DEC005482500
25 novembre 2003
On 8 December 1997 and 2 March 1998 the applicant was additionally charged with an abuse of power, fraud and forgery.
Page 78 sur 114
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD003303804
8 juillet 2014
On 19 February 2001 a criminal investigation was initiated against the four police officers from Ilfov Police Inspectorate for abuse of authority, forgery of official documents, use of forged
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD006998114
17 mars 2016
On 22 April 2014 the Prosecutor General’s Office instituted criminal proceedings under Articles 308.1 (abuse of power) and 313 (forgery by an official) of the Criminal Code in connection
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111334
28 septembre 2010
Offences of murder, gross negligence manslaughter, misconduct in public office, forgery and attempting to pervert the course of justice were considered. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515JUD003380908
15 mai 2012
In the meantime, on 1 June 2005, an Algerian court had convicted the applicant, in absentia , of membership of a terrorist organisation acting both in Algeria and abroad, and of forgery.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0315JUD003935805
15 mars 2011
He was charged in absentia with complicity in Suleyman Tsechoyev's kidnapping and murder and forgery of official documents.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296
22 juin 2000
On 2 February 1994 the investigating judge charged Mr Hermanus with misappropriation, fraud, forgery, uttering forged documents and accepting bribes as a civil servant. 25.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1026JUD003021096
26 octobre 2000
On 8 August 1991 the applicant was brought before the Cracow Regional Prosecutor ( Prokurator Wojewódzki ), charged with fraud and forgery and detained on remand.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0423JUD003930018
23 avril 2024
Lithuanian law provides for criminal liability only for forgery of a document (Article 300 of the [Criminal Code]).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512DEC000904417
12 mai 2020
On 14 April 2014 the police took the second applicant into custody on suspicion of management of a criminal organisation, money laundering, forgery of documents, and aiding a tax offence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD006555001
19 octobre 2006
On 29 November 1997 the General Prosecution Service (“the GPS”) detained the applicant on suspicion of forgery committed by a public official ( державним службовцем ). 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1030JUD001342103
30 octobre 2012
of numerous companies, 3) aggravated fraud to the value of PLN 1,146,658.6 to the detriment of coal mines, 4) attempted fraud to the value of 194,287.44 to the detriment of an IT company, 5) forgery
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD005814908
12 février 2013
It had also been established that he was a member of an international gang engaging in the forgery of securities, frauds, and criminal banking operations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0506DEC000361319
6 mai 2025
It appears that he was also later charged with forgery of documents and abuse of public office. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD003943805
20 mai 2014
The applicant lodged a criminal complaint against the manager of the National Railway Company for forgery of a document called “Declarație” , submitted to the special commission while it
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD004842709
27 juin 2017
On 13 August 2004 the applicant was found guilty of forgery of documents (Article 300 § 1 of the Criminal Code) and fraud (Article 182 § 1 of the Criminal Code).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405JUD005482500
5 avril 2005
On 8 December 1997 and 2 March 1998 the applicant was additionally charged with abuse of power by an official (Articles 165 § 2 and 166 § 3 of the UCC) and fraud and forgery
8ème chambre
68008c9aecbbb650faffb167
16 avril 2025
[J] [S], Mme [U] [A] et Mme [M] [V]'de l'ensemble des demandes qu'ils formeront à l'encontre de Mme [C], À titre subsidiaire, Condamner seulement M.
2ème CH - Section 2
5fcaa39263f0b49a4a64c746
7 juillet 2020
BAYONNE a : - renvoyé les parties devant Maître [P] Notaire, et homologué le projet de liquidation et partage de celui-ci sous l'ensemble des réserves figurant aux motifs du présent jugement, qui formeront
Pôle 5 - Chambre 6
60370cd24103c7a77ada591c
18 juin 2015
dispositions du jugement relatives aux frais irrépétibles et aux dépens seront infirmées ; PAR CES MOTIFS Prononce la jonction des procédures RG 14/01470 et RG 14/01563, dit qu'elle n'en formeront