AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0914DEC002466994
14 septembre 1999
14 septembre 1999
Ferrari Bravo, Mr Gaukur Jörundsson, Mr R. Türmen, Mr B. Zupančič, Mr T. Pantiru, Mr R.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138911
4 novembre 2013
4 novembre 2013
On 1 February 2013 the adoption procedure was discontinued on the ground that under Law no. 272-FZ the US applicants had no right to adopt S.T. On 15 February 2013 the US applicants appealed.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0528JUD002142518
28 mai 2026
28 mai 2026
On 17 February 2008 at around 9 p.m. the applicant and B. started a fight with the off-duty police officers.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0926DEC003719197
26 septembre 2000
26 septembre 2000
Between 17 January and 18 February 1997 police officers from the anti-terrorist branch of the İzmir Security Directorate arrested the applicants on suspicion of membership of the PKK.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0610DEC000820404
10 juin 2008
10 juin 2008
On 26 February 2004 the prosecution filed a bill of indictment with the Radom District Court. On 4 February 2005 the Radom District Court convicted the applicant as charged. The applicant appealed.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56347
24 avril 2004
24 avril 2004
7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } Resolution ResDH(2004)4 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 8 February
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110651
12 mars 2012
12 mars 2012
On 20 February 2008 the court of appeal upheld the decision of 13 February 2008, after noting that the preventive measure chosen by the town court was appropriate in the light of the gravity of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116631
17 janvier 2013
17 janvier 2013
On 25 February 2010 the prosecutor asked for an extension of the applicant’s detention, essentially for the same reasons as those relied on earlier.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118151
6 mars 2013
6 mars 2013
The court detained the applicant and ordered to calculate his term of imprisonment from 21 February 2005, taking into account his two days detention between 24 and 26 September 2004.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122154
3 juin 2013
3 juin 2013
On 11 February 2013 the applicant’s CD4+ T cell count was 119. On 19 February 2013 the Bryankivskyy Local Court sentenced the applicant to six and a half years’ imprisonment for drug trafficking.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127147
19 septembre 2013
19 septembre 2013
His request was not accepted and on 18 February 2008 he was requested to join his military unit. The applicant joined the Antalya Infantry Training Brigade on 21 February 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114DEC004138807
14 novembre 2019
14 novembre 2019
On 5 February 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant’s relatives requesting them to indicate to the Court whether there was any heirs who wished to pursue the proceedings before the Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1014DEC004484298
14 octobre 2004
14 octobre 2004
On 28 February 2001 the Court received the Government's observations.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC002591406
12 janvier 2010
12 janvier 2010
On 11 February 2002 the District Court found the applicant guilty of forcing certain individuals to perform contractual obligations and sentenced him to one year’s correctional labour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0314DEC006610716
14 mars 2023
14 mars 2023
On 27 February 2015 the court ruled that the presumption of service of the decision had taken effect on 25 February 2015. 3. On 8 July 2015 the decision was confirmed on appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0316DEC003345596
16 mars 1999
16 mars 1999
On that date and on 10 February 1997, certain witnesses were heard.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201497
28 janvier 2020
28 janvier 2020
On 9 February 2018 counsel for D. brought a claim against Ms V. and her business partner Mr K. for the protection of D.’s personality rights.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157313
24 août 2015
24 août 2015
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that there was no legal basis for his detention from 27 December 2012 to 12 February 2013.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-78054
2 novembre 2006
2 novembre 2006
This request was dismissed by the Conseil d'Etat by decision of 11 February 2004.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD002126804
6 décembre 2007
6 décembre 2007
The Government submitted that the judgment of 3 February 2004 had been fully enforced on 21 February 2006.
Source officiellePage 78 sur 2955