She further alleged that her conviction had been based on her statements which she had withdrawn and that she had not been allowed to examine a witness against her. 4.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 20.

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 19.

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 20.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

The court did not indicate anything as to the applicant’s allegations of having been beaten.

    He was not notified in time whether enforcement proceedings had been opened, or what action had been taken to execute the judgment.

Apparently neither party to these proceedings had informed the Appeals Board that, in the meantime, an amicable settlement had been concluded and that the agreed amount had been paid to the applicant.

    Une deuxième audition de Z.M. eut lieu à Berne, le 28 mars 2000, devant le juge d’instruction compétent. 13.

  Article 5 § 1 of the Convention   The Court observed that the applicant’s detention on remand had been based on a suspicion that he had been involved in acts qualified under Polish substantive

Moreover, several days after the interviews in question, Mr Lebed had been elected governor and the applicant had been arrested and charged with the rape of a minor.

She has been permanently resident there ever since. She started her job at the Olaine chemical complex in 1966.

  Finally, the Court noted that the second applicant had not been excluded from the decision-making process with regard to her daughter and, in particular, that she had been able to put a halt to

have been the consequence not of a depressive syndrome but of an acting-out process linked to such disorders, especially if his medication had not been taken correctly.

However, a police investigation concluded that the injuries had been sustained during arrest and that the force used had been proportionate.

for her to have access to the case file on which the decision had been based.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to an independent and impartial tribunal) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Berro-Lefèvre, judges , and Mr S.