Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11546
30 mai 2017
30 mai 2017
Having advanced the court costs on behalf of their clients the applicants requested and were granted an order for the legal costs and fees (totalling between EUR 150 and EUR 2,180) to be paid directly
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194160
31 mai 2019
31 mai 2019
In that connection can the applicant bring complaints solely on his own behalf with respect to the alleged violations of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201320
20 janvier 2020
20 janvier 2020
6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, having regard to their complaints of their inability to examine certain witnesses for the prosecution or to obtain the examination of certain witnesses on their behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114DEC005058711
14 novembre 2019
14 novembre 2019
No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1128DEC000888917
28 novembre 2019
28 novembre 2019
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. The Court’s letter came back on 20 April 2018 as “unclaimed”.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0912DEC003619010
12 septembre 2019
12 septembre 2019
On 24 January 2019 the Government’s observations were forwarded to the applicant’s mother, acting as the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181936
6 mars 2018
6 mars 2018
Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on her behalf, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention? 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022DEC002812410
22 octobre 2015
22 octobre 2015
The applicant complained in substance under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention that he did not have a possibility to challenge his paternity as the prosecutor refused to file an action on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC003412304
9 décembre 2014
9 décembre 2014
By a letter of 16 June 2014 his wife, Ms Ilinka Mladenovska, informed the Court about the applicant’s death on 22 July 2012 and about her intention to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188940
4 décembre 2018
4 décembre 2018
(see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 102-03, ECHR 2014, and Nölkenbockhoff v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178153
27 septembre 2017
27 septembre 2017
first ‑ instance court considered that the applicant had had the intention of creating propaganda material in favour of the MLKP when she filmed the event and that her acts were committed on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC005107910
25 août 2022
25 août 2022
alleged heirs requesting a copy of an official document certifying that they were the applicant’s legal heirs and a duly signed authority empowering the representatives to act before the Court on their behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0406DEC002676821
6 avril 2023
6 avril 2023
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC004613213
25 août 2022
25 août 2022
By letter dated 22 February 2022, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the applicant’s representative was invited to submit, on behalf of the applicant, the written observations
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2101
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
already been fully established on the basis of the parties’ statements and enclosed documents – notably the impugned contract – and that it had therefore been unnecessary to hear the witnesses called on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109DEC001398019
9 novembre 2023
9 novembre 2023
The applicant’s lawyer was also invited to submit by 30 May 2023 written observations in reply on behalf of the applicant, together with any claim for just satisfaction.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6193
25 novembre 1999
25 novembre 1999
Search requests were sent to the German, Polish, Belarus, and Ukrainian authorities in 1993, and to Interpol offices in twelve European countries in 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199539
29 novembre 2019
29 novembre 2019
The Constitutional Court considered that, in a situation where the authority form accompanying the constitutional complaint empowered an attorney office (legal person) to act on the applicant’s behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203DEC004313720
3 février 2022
3 février 2022
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC000860506
27 mars 2012
27 mars 2012
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officiellePage 78 sur 556