The applicant complains that the proceedings were not fair because the Court of Appeal convicted her without hearing anew all the witness statements relied upon for the purposes of the conviction.

B A, représenté par Me Bechaux, enregistrée le 2 avril 2025, tendant à obtenir l'exécution du jugement n° 2304629 rendu le 28 janvier 2025.

A panel of three judges annulled the dismissals because the persons concerned had not had the benefit of the guarantees provided for under Bulgarian law in connection with official investigations, which

The applicant also complained that because of that non-enforcement, his right to protection of property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention was violated.

requested by their parents for religious reasons: inadmissible   The applicant parents, belonging to a Christian community, reject the attendance of private or State schools for their children because

a person addicted to alcohol, but there is a link with the other categories in sub-paragraph (e), namely that they may be deprived of their liberty either in order to be given medical treatment or because

The court considered that the applicant had committed that offence because he behaved and appeared as the Mufti of Xanthi.

The applicant alleges that he was not able to take part in this hearing because he was not brought to the courtroom, despite his request. He received a copy of this decision on 5 October 2007.

According to the applicant, he was arrested because police officers had seen him at a trolleybus stop and knew he had already a criminal record.

She subsequently submitted a compensation claim only because she no longer qualified for the reduction in working hours, as her child had passed the age-limit.

The applicant further maintains that because of general overcrowding and poor hygiene conditions, inmates were more prone to catch viruses, infections and skin diseases, such as, among others, skin fungus

proceedings against him were not fair in that: (1)     he was not able to consult and make a copy of the case file; (2)     he could not question the witnesses for the prosecution because

The Court could not accept the Government’s argument that the applicant could not meet a lawyer in order to provide a power of attorney for the Court because the lawyer did not have an authority to meet

He was kept in Daugavpils Prison for over a year where he was allegedly subjected to violence by other inmates because they knew he had acted as a police informant and was a sex offender.

under Article 6   §   1 of the Convention, that the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of the time-limit for lodging applications entailed a violation of his right of access to a court, because

  She could not marry him because, at that time, divorce was not allowed in Spain.   The applicant, her daughter and A.R. lived in accommodation belonging to A.R.

applicant’s employment had been terminated solely as a result of the school’s need to change the requirements for her post, as the Government had claimed, or whether, as she argued, she had been dismissed because

The claim was dismissed on the grounds that the claim had become statutorily barred; this was because the applicant must have learned about the death of his parents in 2001 when the indictment was brought